Search results

It's stupid. What's to refute? Read song of solomon, no, on second thought I don't want you to have a heart attack. Trust me, God does not hate unfettered love making in marriage

So if I say: "I do not know George." does it mean I never intend to meet George? No, it just means I currently don't know George. Your logic escapes me here...

In my understanding the church didn't have leaders per say in the early days. They had teachers but no one leader. Peter could not be the first pope, because: Peter was married According to the Catholic church the clergy should be celibate: “Clerics are obliged to observe perfect and perpetual...

Lol, and it just gets sillier. You want me to believe that Mary, who was engaged to be married and at this point didn't really understand yet what was going on with the angel, had already decided previously that she was never going to have sex with this man who she was marrying? What? Just look...

Lol, that chart is pretty funny.

Oh boy, the secret code Bible! This is as silly as the Devinci code. Mary was a women, not an ark.

In this verse, Jesus is speaking directly to the apostle Peter and indirectly to the other apostles. Jesus’ words meant that Peter would have the right to enter the kingdom himself, that he would have general authority symbolized by the possession of the keys, and that preaching the gospel would...

Well according to the Bible, sex is part of marriage, so there's that...why should we assume she and Joseph were just roommates?

The important thing is that they are not white supremacists, so why should he condemn them?

No, it just says no sex at that point in time. It doesn't say she remained a Virgin forever.

So, the Bible can not be read by the common man? The common man should be punished up to and including death for simply reading the Bible? Wow, nice doctrine you have there.

Wow, that's a stretch! Funny, I don't see the diciples believing in Mary, but Jesus. Where did any of them ever ask Mary to pray for them? You guys love to spin verses into saying stuff that's not there. Cults do that, you know.

Neither of these say Peter is the head of the church, though.

And how about when the Catholics burning people at the stake for simply reading God's word in their own language? Was that doing God's will?

Why do you pray for Mary to help you pray, when there's no Biblical indication anywhere that you should do so?

Nothing there about Peter being the head of the church. This verse applies to every believer.

And it's blasphemy to say Peter is one with Jesus. Was Peter divine?

Just creating doctrine out of nothing...

No he was commanded to go fishing. Are you just making this stuff up?

What? It doesn't say anything like that.