Search results

And by your OWN standards – please show me where the Bible teaches the following. Chapter and verse, please - in CONTEXT: - Sola Scriptura - Sola Fide - Imputed righteousness - Eternal Security (“Once Saved, Always Saved”) - A Pre-Trib “Rapture” - Denominations Only THEN can you question...

And that Church was called “The Catholic Church”. It wasn’t called “My Church” . . . The Church, in its wisdom has listed all of its teachings in a text called, The Catechism of the Catholic Church, and is readily available for reference.

I see that you’re starting out with your usual litany of LIES .. . I have never stated that anti-Catholics are against all “individual” Catholics. I have always stated that an anti-Catholic is a person who LIES about what the Catholic Church teaches. Ans, as I have informed you – ad nauseam - I...

continued . . . Jesus absolutely IS the head of the Church – but He appointed Peter as prime minister, to build His Church (Matt. 16:16-18). Jesus singled out Peter when He gave him the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven (Matt. 16:18-19). - Jesus asked Peter and Peter alone to feed His lambs and...

What a perverted understanding of Scripture. In Matt. 23:8-9, is Jesus telling us that we can’t call certain people "fathers" or “teachers” when they may actually be fathers or teachers? Absolutely NOT. He is telling us that no man is to be considered father or teacher ABOVE our Father and...

Really - half?? Can you back up that claim with actual FACTS? While you're at it - can you show me where the Bible teaches the non-Catholic teaching of Sola Scriptura is found? According to Strong’s Greek Concordance – which is used by Protestants AND Catholics alike – Acts 9:31 is translated...

Ummmmm, where did I make this claim in my post? I merely stated that anti-Catholics usually ignorant of what the Catholic Church teaches. Being an anti-Catholic yourself - I understand your confusion . . .

Spoken like 2 people who are completely ignorant of Catholic teaching. This is usually the case when it comes to anti-Catholics . . .

I'm simply illustrating the unbroken line of succession in the early Chgurch. We can't simplu discard hisory in the name of an unbilical doctrine like Sola Scriptura . . . Acts 1:20 “For it is written in the Book of Psalms, “‘May his camp become desolate, and let there be no one to dwell in...

This is the problem with Sola Scriptura. It completely discards history. Hippolytus of Rome was a disciple of Irenaeus, a disciple of Polycarp, who was a disciple of Apostle John. Hippolytus's works were considered lost prior to their discovery at a monastery on Mount Athos in 1854. In his...

Not only are Jesus and the Father NOT obscured by this - they are exalted.

Instead of simply refusing to respond - I suggest you try studying the Scriptures in their proper context . . .

A “handed down tradition”, as you call it IS an Apostolic teaching. The Apostles appointed others to take their place after they died – and this succession continued down through the centuries. In Acts 1, we see that the Apostles gathered together to choose a successor for Judas. Peter quotes...

And even after I’ve explained to you – ad nauseam – you still can’t comprehend the difference between traditions of men (i.e., washing of hands) and sacred Apostolic teaching. The Church didn’t “invent” doctrines centuries after the Apostles. These were beliefs and practices FROM the Apostles...

Correct. Mark 7: 5 is absolutely about corrupt religious, man-made tradition being placed ABOVE the Word of God. There are man-made traditions – and there are Sacred Apostolic Traditions. You have placed an invented, man-made tradition called “Sol Scriptura” above the Word of God. This nonsense...

WRONG. The Bible absolutely rejects Sola Scriptura. If Scripture was our “ONLY” Authority – Jesus would NEVER have said the following to His Church: Matt 16:16-19, Matt. 18:15-18 WHATEVER YOU BIND on earth shall be bound in heaven; and WHATEVER YOU LOOSE on earth shall be loosed in heaven."...

Through the faith of the parents, they can enter a Covenant with God. Are you denying this Biblical (Gen. 17:10-14) fact?

You are adding to Scripture here. It does NOT say – does nor even IMPLY what you are saying. Imply The Greek word used here is οπηελιμοσ (o-fel'-ee-mos), and is defined as: “Helpful; serviceable; profitable” It doesn’t mean “sufficient” or “exclusive”. Words have meanings – and you can’t just...

Then explain to me how infants were able to enter into a Covenant with God through circumcision, if NOT through the faith of their parents. How can an infant enter into a Covenant?? Funny how you completely ignored that point . . .

2 Tim. 3:16-17 states: “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is PROFITABLEE for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.” It says that it’s profitable – it doesn’t say that...