Search results

Tell that to Jesus . . . Matt. 26:24 The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man (Judas) who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.”

People are judge by their ACTIONS - and NOT not by their obscure statements. Remember - Joe Biden claims to be a "devout" Catholic - while fighting vehemently for abortion rights . . . Hitler’s obsession with the occult is well-documented . . . Occultism in Nazism - Wikipedia Unholy Alliance...

Baptism is the circumcision of the heart A "Covenant" by definition is a "solemn agreement between 2 or more parties." Can you explain to me how infants were able to enter into a Covenant with God, if NOT through the faith of their parents?? Why would entry into the New Covenant be any...

Hmmm . . . Can you show me where the Bible mentions the names of the Books that comprise it? NOWHER does the Bible give is an official canon of Scripture. That official Canon came from the CHURCH – and not until the 4th century. Can you show me where the Bible demands that we ONLY believe in...

While it is true that Hitler was a baptized Catholic in his youth – He was Catholic name ONLY. He was no more a practicing Catholic than Charles Manson was a “peaceful hippie”. Not only did Hitler NOT attribute his reign of terror to Jesus – he was heavily into promoting the pagan power of...

YOU haven't proven it . . .

I already have. The ball is in YOUR court. If you believe in a perverted doctrine that was NEVER taught by the Early Church - you need to provide a defense of it. You "debate" like a child. . .

That's what I thought you' say. I've already DISproved your false doctrine. You've LOST this debate . . .

The onus is on YOU to prove the false 16th century invention of Limited Atonement. My job was to DISprove it - which I have done. You have repatedly failed to supp[ort it Scripturally . . .

Then, not only bare you a fraud - you have disobeyed a dire ct Biblical command ALWAYS be ready to give a reason for this hopr of yours (2 Pet. 3:15). Bottonm line: If you can't explain it from Scripture - then it's NOT Scriptural . . .

Because, like YOU said - it's a poor tranclation. Not ALL sins were forgiven. The price was paid for ALL sins - but only the ones who repent and trust in Christ are forgiven . . .

PROVE it.

That’s what I get for being lazy . . . However – even this flawed version doesn’t support Limited Atonement.

It is the AI version from Google. However - these other versions say the same thing . . . NIV My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have an advocate with the Father—Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins...

The following verses that I have THRICE presented don't need an exegetical treatise. There is nothing "hidden" or "mystical" about them. They say plainly that Jesus paid for ALL of the sines of ALL people. It's a clear as NO explanation is necessary I've never met an adherent of the false...

I've given you Scriptural proof that Limited Atonement is a FALSE doctrine. It’s blindingly-clear that YOU are afraid to engage in this topic because the weight of Scripture is against you. You have simply rejected my evidence without providing ANY of your own. Ummmm, talk about cowardly . . ...

If you’re not prepared to defend your heresy – then just say so. The onus is on YOU because this heresy was NOT invented until the 16rg century. It was NOT taught from before that – all the way back to the Apostles. The heresy of Limited Atonement posits that only the sins of the “Elect” were...

No – that’s NOT how it works. I presented my Scriptural evidence. I bolded and underlined the pertinent parts. The onus is on YOU to disprove it. These verses clearly refute the Calvinist heresy of Limited Atonment.

That doesn't even make sense. Refute the Scriptural evidence I presented. Limited Atonement is a Calvinist heresey . . . I John 2:1-2 My little children, I am writing this to you so that you may not sin; but if any one does sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous...

Actually - not the founder - just the one of the best explainers. I would say that boh Augustine and Thomas Acquinas best explained the doctrines pof the Church. But, I wouldn't say that they invented them.