Search results

I don't know why you're saying this. I'm simply asking you to tell me how you interpret Matthew 24:35-39 and how do you reconcile what it says with your Premil doctrine? If you read it as straightforwardly as you read Revelation 20, you should see that Jesus indicated that heaven and earth will...

Which passage? I assume you mean Revelation 20? The dragon is obviously symbolic of Satan. It portrays a dragon, which symbolically represents Satan, being chained up with a great chain in a prison, not Satan himself. Satan is a spirit being and can't be literally chained up. That all...

Sure, but I have to leave for now. But, I will address it when I get a chance either later today or tomorrow.

How about you address what the passage does say instead of what it doesn't say? Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. 36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. 37 But as the days of Noah were, so...

Well, thank you for actually addressing something I said in the original posts. His kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. That's why we can say we are in it now because, as He said, it did not come with observation (Luke 17:20 - it's not a physical, visible kingdom like an earthly kingdom is) and...

LOL. This must be some kind of joke because you won't even address one single thing I said in the original posts, but you expect me to address everything you bring up. Ridiculous. You are just proving that you have nothing to refute anything I said in the original post. If you were actually...

I'm not going to address anything more of what you say until you actually address at least one thing I posted in the second post. You think you can just come here and ignore the original posts and try to act as if I have to address your points while you ignore mine. Think again.

That someone definitely is not you. The next coherent argument you make will be the first one you've ever made.

I do believe it and, unlike you, I interpret it in such a way that agrees with the rest of scripture. LOL! You won't even address the topic of the thread and you're telling me this? LOL! So, just tell me how you reconcile it with the rest of scripture then. Do you think you should interpret...

What is wrong with having Paul as our standard example to follow? Do you have a problem with what he said here... 1 Corinthians 4:15 Even if you had ten thousand guardians in Christ, you do not have many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel. 16 Therefore I urge...

How about you just address what I said in the original posts? That would make for good discussion. That was the purpose of creating this thread. So far, not one Premil has even attempted to do so. You could be the first! You would get major kudos from me if you explained to me how you can...

Personally, I don't think any of it is unclear at this point, but we're talking about the most highly symbolic book in all of scripture here. If you think this is so clear then tell me exactly who or what the beast is, what the mark of the beast is and what the image of the beast is. And tell...

So, you believe that Jesus was tempted by His own fleshly desires in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights rather than being tempted by a an evil, supernatural spirit being called the devil and Satan? That is not possible because Jesus did not have natural fleshly sinful desires like we do. The...

No, it hasn't. Nice excuse you came up with here to not bother addressing anything in the original posts. How about just picking one thing and addressing it? LOL. Yes, passages contained within books that undeniably contain a good amount of symbolism are always considered to be clear and...

Yes, and you're missing the context and I will explain why I'm saying that below... There is no indication at all that Revelation 6:11 is talking about a short amount of time only from God's perspective. His people are being told to wait and rest easy for a short amount of time for their deaths...

In no other place in the world at any time has an army completely surrounded a city and completely destroyed it along with most of its people who were still in the city while taking the rest of its people in the city captive to all nations while radically affecting that people's religion by...

Not once have you been able to refute anything I've said with any kind of coherent argument. You're all talk and no substance. You are not qualified to be a Bible teacher and you've wasted 40 years being a false teacher. It's sad.

Like I said (see above). We now have 2 Premils who have responded and neither of them addressed one single point that I made in the original posts. That says it all.

Talk about pyschobabble. The fact that you did not even attempt to specifically address anything I said in my original posts says it all. You just believe what you want to believe. You can't reconcile your beliefs with the scriptures I referenced in the original posts and you know it or else you...

Perhaps you forgot to address either of my original posts? It looks like you have no answer for anything I said in those posts? Do you just ignore all the scriptures I referenced? You think cherry picking scripture instead of forming your doctrine on all of scripture is acceptable? It is not...