Search results

2 rest in Hebrews 4 not one. The rest which is the Gospel and the seventh day Sabbath rest. They are not the same. How do we know? The works for the Gospel rest were finished from the foundation of the world. For God had rested from all His works. Which include the rest which is the Gospel...

First off Jesus said Let them without sin cast the first stone. Second Christ is our high priest. All Judgement has in that respect been moved to His power since the Levitical priesthood has been nullified in the New Covenant.

Matt 24 shows us Jesus expected His followers to be keeping the Sabbath up through the tribulation to His second coming through the grammar. Which you are choosing to ignore. And now in reference to Hebrews 4 you speak of grammar? 2 rest in Hebrews 4 not one. The rest which is the Gospel and...

More to it than that. No mention of rubbing wheat to eat.

Yet there in Matt 24 it shows us Jesus expected His followers to be keeping the Sabbath up through the tribulation to His second coming. And there you go again trying to make Hebrews 4 say something it does not. And sadly you as of yet not any attempt to expound on Hebrews four. That says a lot...

Healing was the issue. That is the base of your argument now? God's healing work physically and spiritually is continuous. Menial tasks for secular reasons is not God's work. It is our work and the work we are to rest from.

So you agree with the pharisees? If so, Where does it say someone can't take wheat and roll it in there hands to eat? And what was His final answer? Judge righteously my friend.

Verse 20's praying that our flight not be in the winter nor the Sabbath is connected to all of it my friends by the use of the conjunctive particles, for, and, for. wherefore, for, for and, and respectively. This means that Jesus expected His follows to be keeping the Sabbath until His return...

Nice try but you ignore the grammar and syntax which shares that Jesus expected His followers to be keeping the Sabbath up to His second coming.

Like was said Hebrews four is a difficult passage for most. If you actually understood it you would say more. Take care what you share. Many teach but not many been taught.

Many Christian denominations make a division in Matthew 24. There is no division in Jesus' answer to the three question in verse 3. Verse 20's praying that our flight not be in the winter nor the Sabbath is connected to all of it my friends by the use of the conjunctive particles, for, and, for...

If we are willfully sinning we will die in our sins. Hebrews 4 is a difficult passage for most. You are misinterpreting it.

Many denominations make a division in Matthew 24. There is no division in Jesus' answer to the three question in verse 3. Verse 20's praying that our flight not be in the winter nor the Sabbath is connected to all of it my friends by the use of the conjunctive particles, for, and, for...

. Chapter 5 tells us we are one with Christ and that he will nurture us. But before that he tells us that We are called to walk in love and that if we walk in darkness we will not partake of the kingdom of heaven. Ephesians 5:2 And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given...

The issue is in the "I". The issue is in the "I". Since that is what you think, let us deal with that. As was said We can't fall away from something if we are not there. On the other hand we can't stay put without Christ. We can't be renewed again if we have not been renewed in the first...

.Why would you quote what was said and not the one who said it? Seems a bit deceptive and sneaky not to mention disrespectful. We will address your post when time allows.

I don't even think you believe that. Take care we won't be responding to anything else you post unless you can support the statement above within the context or actually address the points in the posts you are responding to. Your post here doesn't even do that.. The fact alone that the text...

No you didn't. All that to try to explain away what the text actually says. Shame no one gets that from a simple reading of what the text plainly states. That alone should be and probably was a red flag for those whom put forth the doctrine of OSAS initially. Quit simply My friend We can't...

You failed to answer the points the OP brought out.

What was said was said. References are listed.