Search results

But they are like. Adam was the first of the human race while Jesus is the first of those who will raised from the dead to eternal life. Our human life comes through Adam while our spiritual life is through Jesus. As for Eve she was full of grace just like Mary but Mary remained obedient. Eve...

If he had free will he followed. That's a choice. Adam is no better since as you rightly claim he is ultimately responsible but Jesus corrects that and is the new Adam. And Mary by her obedience to the will of God corrects where eve failed and can be considered the new eve. The church is the...

To say Eve leads Adam into sin is to ignore free will. Adam knew all too well they weren't supposed to eat that fruit. In fact I think it's more like Adam failed Eve and us. This is why we needed Jesus.

Great lots of noise little content. Try to focus this time. Cite from Scripture where it says Scripture is the sole/only source of faith. Please don't waste time with 2 Timothy 3:16. That doesn't say only.

Well I'm talking about protestants not Christians. The church fathers were Christians and there were decidedly not protestants.

Cite Paul If I were you I'd put me on ignore too

How about you? Do you have the capability to show that anything you believe existed before the 1500s?

Let alone where it says, "Again you have heard that our ancestors were told: 'Do not swear falsely, but fulfill the vows you have made to the Lord'". (Matt 5:33) Why would we be told to fulfill a vow to the Lord if doing so was "of the evil one"?

Two reasons. 1) to see if you can back up your claim. This far the answer is "No". 2) to make sure people know this is a puppet show you put on. If or when you recognize you're not in charge of the discussion and decide not to just spew the parrot feed you've been given then I'll listen and...

There are 2 things that will make me go away. You only need one but I give you choices. You're welcome. 1) show evidence that any of the crap you believe existed before the 1500s 2) admit you can't and acknowledge what you believe is bs. There going to. Easy peasy.

Because you need to know that the crap you believe is from the mind of the Looney Monk not God or the bible but your pomposity is engrained for you to listen. No I'll go away when mods kick me off. Your kind won't go unchallenged if I'm around

You're making claims and can't back them up. I don't care what you want.

No need as nothing you people believe existed prior to the 1500s.

Can you people answer the question of not? In 2000+ years how many times has the Pope spok n in ex cathedra. You people spew garbage but you never actually engage. I have so.little.regard for you people. I'm as nice as I am to you because I feel bad for how far astray you've been led.

So nothing that says Scripture only. You folks refuse to believe the bible.

No need for a discussion nobody believed the garbage you people before the 1500s.

No they don't. How many times in 2000+ years has the Pope spoken in ex cathdrea? I'll just copy and paste the question until you answer. You people just spew

What post number? Still waiting for you to show evidence of protestant heresies before the looney little monk.

Complete not perfected. Nice try though.

Show where the bible says bible only. Don't waste time with 2 Timothy 3:16 that doesn't say only