Search results

Daniel 7 27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him. There is no mention of Israel in Daniel 7:27. The...

I'm unable to defend my position to your satisfaction, and you're unable to defend your position to my satisfaction. So what is your answer about Arnold? And why are you unable to provide a link to anything supporting your position? So far, you're a confirmed one man cult. :laughing:

Jesus Himself could cite them and you wouldn't believe Him. He has cited Himself and you don't believe Him. Bro. Arnold, your mentor, calls you out. :laughing: Why don't you believe him? Additionally, please provide a link to the source of your covenantless claptrap. I want to identify the...

Bro. Arnold agrees. "At this point some confusion has arisen as to the relationship of the Church to the New Covenant, because, according to Jeremiah, the covenant is made, not with the Church, but with Israel. Nevertheless, a number of Scriptures connect the New Covenant with the Church (Mat...

Where does Bro. Arnold Fruchtenbaum say that the New Covenant is unfulfilled? Verbatim quote, source, date.

Whom to believe? 1. Historical Reformation historicists 2. A modernist forum faux historicist Need a hint? :laughing:

False. Below is a list of scores of Protestant Reformers. Note: Joseph Mede isn't among them. :laughing: Every one in the list was historicist. With the exception of Latimer and Tyndale, every one in the list was amil. List of Protestant Reformers - Wikipedia

Speaking of dumb grammar: "Their already separated." "putting their two cense into it" Did you flunk kindergarten English? :laughing:

Agree.

Couldn't agree more. It's a deplorable indication of the extent to which Darby/Scofield dispenism has apostasized and defiled the Church from within. Don't know about you, but I'm of at least some persuasion that the glorious Church without spot, wrinkle, blemish, or stain of Ephesians 5:27 is...

Amen bro. But he doesn't believe it.

You like to lecture about your grammatical excellence, but you don't know what adjectives and nouns are. Keep those lectures coming. :laughing:

"When the armies had begun the siege of Jerusalem no one would be able to say whether or not the Romans would go as far as destroying the temple. " Jesus' disciples were "able to say" because they were His audience at His Olivet Discourse when He prophesied the temple's destruction. Matthew...

Luke doesn't mention the temple specifically in Luke 21:20, but does say that the armies would desolate Jerusalem. Why would the disciples believe that Jerusalem would be desolated, but that the temple within Jerusalem would be spared?

They're a series of adjectives modifying a noun, every one of which can be found in a lexicon. Too much for you to comprehend. :laughing:

True. However, verse 29 is not "involving" anything, as it is simply a non-literal figurative hyperbolic apocalyptic expression of the significance, both spiritual and temporal, of the events of AD 70, highly similar to the expressions in Isaiah and Ezekiel that I cited. True. Again, verse 29...

Yes, it's on this forum which is not found on the internet. :laughing: Keep those gems coming. :laughing:

Sure.

You need to take some of your own advice and cease the hypersensitivity and innuendo. What seems to be a long gap to us may be only days to God.

Scripture says it. I agree with Scripture. Including "Immediately". You said: "But, the sun being darkened and moon not giving its light and such are said to be things that occur "AFTER the tribulation of those days" is over, not DURING the tribulation of those days, as you are trying to...