Search results

You've been shown examples of apocalyptic imagery. Your denials are irrelevant.

It certainly was Peter's intention, otherwise he would not have said "This is that". I believe Peter. You don't.

But they didn't go out when Babylon, Idumea, and Egypt were destroyed.

Sound arguments against cultism.

OT examples below of apocalyptic imagery describing prophecies fulfilled long ago, having nothing to do with "latter days". Joel 2 uses similar imagery. Peter declares "this is that" in the present tense. I believe Joel and Peter. Isaiah describes the destruction of Babylon. Isaiah 13 10...

Acts 2:16-21 represents the initial fulfillment of Joel's prophecy, and the continuation of the fulfillment of that prophecy ever since, up to this moment in time, for every individual who "calls on the name of the Lord". Acts 2:21 Joel 2:30-32 was gloriously fulfilled in the birth of the NT...

Couldn't agree more, brother. And cult it is, one of the most abhorrent examples on this forum.

Colossians 1 13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: Romans 8 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? 36 As it is written...

Colossians 1 13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: Have you been translated? Apparently not. Romans 8 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or...

Scriptureless and false. Peter is claiming fulfillment at Pentecost ("this is that") beginning in the last days, which had already begun. (Hebrews 1:2) Peter was not a dispensational futurite. I believe Peter. You don't.

The remnant is saved in Romans 9:27. "All Israel" is saved in Romans 9:6-8. They are one and the same in Romans 9. Therefore they are one and the same in Romans 11. There is no contrast.

Scriptureless as usual. Try these. Acts 2 16 But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; 17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and...

He then would have used the future tense where applicable. But he didn't. Your interpretation is not his interpretation.

If you spent a fraction of the time that you spend attempting to contort God into a racist, instead learning to understand "all Israel" and "of Israel", you'd be immeasurably farther ahead. But you refuse. There's no "nation of Israel" in Romans 9. There are "all Israel" and "of Israel"...

Thanks for your confirmation. Any reference to the "nation of Israel" is conspicuously absent.

Why did you not italicize "not"? :laughing: There's a diametric difference between "it is" and "it is not". Any imaginary "troubling perception" is yours alone. It is due to your refusal to understand the difference between "all Israel" and "of Israel". Until you do, your "troubling...

Here are many promises. Any reference to the "nation of Israel" is conspicuously absent.

The Jeremiah passage is quoted virtually verbatim in Hebrews 8:8-12. Why did you ignore it? It is prefaced by Hebrews 8:6 and concluded by Hebrews 8:13: Hebrews 8 6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was...

Quote the verse in which "God isn't keeping His promise".

He awaits nothing. He delivers His Kingdom, which He established at His first coming, to His Father. 1 Corinthians 15 24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.