Search results

But "you" in verse 2 are Jesus' disciples at His Olivet discourse. When and how did Jesus' disciples at His Olivet discourse metamorphose into "the Jews that will be alive at the end of the age."? At which verse between verse 2 and verse 9 did that metamorphosis occur?

So you don't believe that Jesus' discourse with His disciples is a fact, or that the Book of Acts is a fact. But since both are facts, they convincingly rebut your clear fantasies. And you ignored the question. Here it is again: Who are "you" in verse 9?

They don't. Who are "you" in verse 9? The book of Acts gives a complete account of how the disciples were persecuted in the very ways Jesus had predicted. Let us take, for example, Acts 4: "And they laid hands on them [Peter and John], and put them in prison" (verse 3). They were brought...

Why not tell us who is the grammatical antecedent/referent of "them", "ye", and "you" in verse 2. Who are "them", "ye", and "you" referring to? 1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said unto...

Don't be a victim of interpretation by imagination. :laughing: Matthew 24 1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall...

The classic trademark of a cult. Refusal to consider anything that might detonate its fallacies and fantasies. You're a perfect fit. :laughing:

You were eager to tell us what a tough guy you are. But still afraid of post 70. :laughing:

No digging needed. It's all in Post 70. You're evidently afraid of it. :laughing:

Post 70. You're evidently afraid of it. :laughing:

Post 70. You're evidently afraid of it. :laughing:

Thanks for confirming the objective evidence of nothing but your own untested personal subjective opinionated spirit. Cultism on parade. :laughing:

Until you present objective evidence, your claims re. the Spirit are merely subjective opinions of your spirit. That's pure cultism.

Until you can provide objective evidence that you have tested the spirit, and that the spirit has passed the test, then your claim to represent the spirit is mere subjective personal opinion by your spirit. That's pure cultism. So all of the historical evidence about Jesus' First Coming is...

What to believe? 1. Objective evidence or 2. Subjective opinion I'll take the first. Every time. I presented Scriptural historical evidence in post 70, and invited you in post 100 to present yours. I'm still waiting.

1 John 4 1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. What are ways that we can try, or test, the spirits? Does examining for the presence or absence of historical evidence not constitute one way to...

You don't seem to have an interest in explaining yourself. Why is that?

Define the academic level of what won't happen.

Why not? Scriptural history is truth which wins the debate. A dispensational futurist denies Scriptural history. Truth originates in the Holy Spirit, not "your spirit" or "your soul". John 16:13

Of course I'll miss what won't happen. So will you. :laughing:

If you have Scripture and/or history disproving what I've presented, then present yours. But consult with the Judaean Christians first. Thankfully not one of them was a dispensational futurist. :laughing: