Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The historical account of the Judaean Christians' flight is given by Eusebius of Caesarea, acclaimed Father of Church History: The people of the Church in Jerusalem were commanded by an oracle given by revelation before the war to those in the city who were worthy of it to depart and dwell in...
  2. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Answer my question first, then I'll answer yours.
  3. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    They're antitalmudic, not antisemitic. Do you know the difference?
  4. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Josephus is a recognized historian. You're not. :laughing: Do you think you know more about Jewish history than Jews know about Jewish history? You don't. :laughing: You got your info from your imagination.
  5. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    To the Judaean Christians just prior to 70 AD, it referred to the Roman armies advancing on the holy city Jerusalem. They recognized the sign, and fled, and saved their lives.
  6. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    "So, you're going to believe something from an organization whose purpose is to denounce anything that could possibly lead to Christ?" What a ludicrous statement. When Titus gave credit to God for the Roman victory, did he "denounce anything that could possibly lead to Christ"? "We have...
  7. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    True. Messiah the Prince was the prince to come. He came between five and six centuries after Daniel wrote. Hogwash. :laughing: Here is a description of 70 AD from the Jewish Virtual Library itself. Ancient Jewish History: The Great Revolt No conscripts to be seen. Only Roman troops and...
  8. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils) Bk 2, chap. 17 “The pope is of so...
  9. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The Roman commander Titus was considerably smarter than you. :laughing: "We have certainly had God for our assistant in this war, and it was no other than God who ejected the Jews out of these fortifications; for what could the hands of men or any machines do towards overthrowing these...
  10. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Messiah the Prince is undeniably the most important part. If you understood antecedents/referents, you would agree. But you don't. Where in the passage does the word "antichrist" occur? The people of Messiah the Price are of secondary importance. They were the Romans and Jews, both of whom...
  11. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Amen bro.
  12. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    So true, bro. They need to contort and mutilate the obvious in an attempt to shoehorn it into their dispen paradigm. Nonsense upon nonsense it certainly is.
  13. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    There is no difference. "Judaea" is the same "Judaea" in all three accounts. The flight is the same in all three accounts. The AoD was the armies surrounding Jerusalem, the sign to flee. That is accurately handling the Word of Truth, not dispensatanally contorting and mutilating it. You...
  14. C

    The Relationship Between Israel and the Church

    Do you think Messiah the Prince is cute?
  15. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Judaea in Matthew 24:16 = Judaea in Mark 13:14 = Judaea in Luke 21:20 They obeyed every one of them. Your claim is invalid. "He" in Daniel 9:27 is Messiah the Prince, who is clearly not in Daniel 11:22-23. Your claim is invalid. I asked if you understand grammar. You didn't respond. Who is...
  16. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    You've been shown that the antecedents/referents of "he" in verse 27 grammatically resolve back to Messiah the Prince in verse 25. Making Him The Covenant Confirmer. Do you understand grammar?
  17. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    They understood that it meant to flee, which is exactly what they did. If they'd been dispensational futurists, they'd have remained in Jerusalem and perished. But they were waaaaaay smarter than you. :laughing: Thank God for the preservation of the Judaean Christian Church.
  18. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    So Jesus never answered any of His disciples' questions. And when He spoke to "you" and "ye", He was speaking to the wind. :laughing: The Judaean Christians invalidate your claim. Prior to 70 AD, they remembered Jesus' warnings, and heeded them, and fled to safety. Matthew 24:15-18; Luke...
  19. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Revelation 11:1-2 for those subscribing to early authorship.
  20. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    70 AD fulfilled Matthew 23:35-39, Matthew 24:1-28, Mark 13:1-23, Luke 21:5-24. Somewhat more than three. :laughing:
View older results
Top Bottom