Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    You're talking complete nonsense. Stop avoiding, and provide just one name of a historical denier of a Messianic Daniel 9:24. Just one name.
  2. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    "Messiah" means "Anointed One". There's your context.
  3. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Apparently not one, since you can't cite him or her. The verse is pure Messiah, as your inability to cite one denier demonstrates.
  4. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The first flight wasn't good enough for you. They have to do it again. Those poor Judean Christians will be tired of fleeing. Talk about dug in. :laughing:
  5. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Debunked. :laughing:
  6. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Who in recognized historic orthodox Christianity has claimed that Daniel 9:24 is not Messianic prophecy?
  7. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Luke 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, Acts 4:27 For of a truth...
  8. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    No digging necessary. The Judaean Christians fled. Evidence in the text, and evidence on the ground. To attempt to equate that to a decapitated orphaned undetermined 70th week is beyond absurd. :laughing:
  9. C

    Rapture Thoughts of Some Early Church Leaders

    Absolutely true. Daniel declares, "Seventy weeks are determined", but their 70th week is decapitated, orphaned, and completely undetermined. It has nothing to do with Daniel's weeks.
  10. C

    ISLAM IS NOT THE REVELATION BEAST

    Did Judaean Christians flee prior to 70 AD?
  11. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Your claim is completely false. By the time of the Reformation, the Reformers had recognized the Roman papacy to be the predominant antichrist of their era. They recognized its characteristics in Daniel 7:8,20,21,24,25; and that it would continue beyond their era, to the end (Daniel...
  12. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    There's no reason to believe it was the end. None whatever.
  13. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    It lines up perfectly with fulfilled history, same as the other two Gospel accounts. The flight of the Judaean Christians. There's no lining up better than that.
  14. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Does someone or something solve something?
  15. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Luke 21:21 is fulfilled history. No amount of desperate denial can change that.
  16. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Amen bro.
  17. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Provide a link to your source for this nonsense. :laughing: You said previously that the Judaean Christians had fled circa 70 AD, which means Luke 21:21 is history. So you've changed your mind?
  18. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Are you finished your whining? I'm not responsible for your inability to comprehend Scripture and English. And having an opinion which differs from yours, and is grounded in historical orthodox Christianity, is not blatant, underhanded, lie, etc, So peddle your faux sanctimony somewhere else...
  19. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Yes, a blatant manifestation of nothing other than the worship of antichrist. I'm long convinced that there is a special compartment in hell reserved for dispensatanism. Because it has the Word, but insists on contorting it into an abomination of desecration. It will experience the same fate...
  20. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Matthew 24 and Luke 21 both refer to Christ warning, and to the Judaean Christians fleeing. And history confirms that they fled. So the only way that Matthew 24 and Luke 21 are not the same is by futurized fantasy and fallacy. No other way. Posttribbers have the witness of both Scripture...
Top Bottom