Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    The Heruli, followed by the Vandals and Ostrogoths.
  2. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Matthew 21:12 And Jesus went into His body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in His body, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
  3. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    If 2 Thessalonians 2:4 is referring to the physical temple of God, what physical temple of God is that? It can't be the temple of God in Jerusalem, because that temple was destroyed not many years after Paul wrote. It can't be the temple of God in Revelation, because that temple is in heaven...
  4. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Imperial Rome fell in 476 AD/CE, and papal Rome "subdued" the first of the three kings of Daniel 7:24 in 493 CE.
  5. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Historically, when imperial Rome was "taken out of the way", what was then revealed?
  6. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    True. Verse 6 confirms that the withholder was withholding the revelation of the man of sin.
  7. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Yes. But you said, "Nothing here says lawlessness gets worse or is restrained." So something is restrained. History exegetes the identity. And history confirms the Scriptural lexical arguments by Tertullian et al.
  8. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    What does "letteth/let" mean?
  9. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    The restrainer, imperial Rome, was removed. Then the man of sin, the apostate papacy, was revealed.
  10. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. then shall that Wicked be revealed
  11. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    2 Thessalonians 2 is not related to the OD. The "man of sin", i.e. apostate papacy, did not begin to appear until after the restrainer, i.e. imperial Roman empire, was "taken out of the way", circa 476 AD/CE.
  12. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    So his consistent use of "naos" is insufficient qualification?
  13. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    The apostate "mystery of iniquity" was already working when Paul wrote (2 Thessalonians 2:7). Within less than 20 years of the dissolution of the restrainer, imperial Rome, the apostate papal Roman empire had emerged and begun overthrowing kingdoms, beginning with three (Daniel 7:24), the...
  14. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    The ECFs and apologists reveal the identity of the restrainer. So does history. Tertullian (2nd-3rd Century) ON THE RESURRECTION, CHAP. XXIV For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now hinders must hinder, until he be taken out of the way." What obstacle is there but the...
  15. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Given that Paul uses "naos" consistently everywhere else, why wouldn't he use it consistently in 2 Thessalonians? And claiming to be God within the Temple of God i.e the Church, is the epitome of deception. What would you call this? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ...
  16. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Paul is consistent in his identification of and distinction between the different temples. No other examples of his within Thessalonians, but plenty outside of it. Paul's "naos" temples refer exclusively to NT believers; collectively, the NT Church. Paul's temples: "naos" spiritual: 1...
  17. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Explain the process by which Jesus went into His body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in His body.
  18. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    You forgot this one: :laughing: Matthew 21:12 And Jesus went into His body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in His body, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
  19. C

    the beast with seven heads and ten horns - the Roman Empire

    Whom to believe? 1. Daniel, the Holy Spirit who inspired him, and Messiah the Covenant Confirming Prince of Whom he wrote. 2. You Need a hint? :laughing:
  20. C

    the beast with seven heads and ten horns - the Roman Empire

    Daniel 9:27 began in 27 AD with the beginning of Jesus' earthly ministry. Ezekiel 39:9 didn't. :laughing:
Top Bottom