Search results

Why do you judge the new babe born of God, by the old man whose father was the devil? Surely, you have no understanding that the two are not one and the same.

King of what, exactly? Context is a literary rule--of men--not of God! In fact, the scriptures show many exceptions where context is completely broken--by God. There are too many to list, but I have given a few examples below--the point being: Stop listening to the teachings of men and their...

@everyone. Pay attention--your own life...by your own measure--is in your hands: This subject and issue, like so many, is only looked at [by us] as it is--because we look at it through the lens of Time. God does not. Every argument then--is to question God--not men or sinners. Is the matter...

So...you do "believe" (meaning that statement is merely what you "believe") that such a thing is impossible for God, and you deny that the scriptures give evidence that He can. Thanks for making yourself clear. "Read...hints...he didn't want to say?" Speculation. Conjecture. Opinion. What you...

No.

Pay attention. I was speaking to you about you, for you are the one who has blasphemed the Spirit via Christ in me.

Christ (in me) on display, which is via the Spirit...and "will not be forgiven."

Let's hear it--how do you "know for certain?"

That was your last chance to redeem yourself from your false accusations--accusation against Christ in me and all who are born again of the spirit of God. Consider the matter sealed then, bound on earth by your confirmation, and "bound in heaven."

This...you could not possibly know. So...I take that as a PS on your public presentation to confirm your position of willingly taking away parts of scripture.

You have done it to yourself "whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven." I only witnessed your public presentation of it. Not really a laughing matter.

Stop attempting to put words in my mouth. That is not what I said--on the contrary, that is what YOU said. Read my #77 post again, and if you do not understand, I can explain further--but not if you again attempt to put words in my mouth and make false accusations.

The records show for themselves...even on this one thread (no need to dig). But thank you for posting your last statement above--for it shows the crux of the problem and your great error: Because ALL scripture has "higher spiritual meaning" than the words used in their writing. ALL scripture...

If that is your position after all this time--you are not waiting on me, but on God to open your eyes--because I have been revealing many things here for years now...many of which you have posted similar rejections to. ...Meaning, you reveal yourself. There--I've done it again!

That "higher spiritual meanings" issue is just regarding this one thread. But you say "if" as if you have not been accusatory, when if you were not making accusations there would be no reason to say "if." So, no, "if" doesn't excuse the great volume of rhetoric against the active spiritual...

Your lying, mocking, and anti-Spirit agenda is enough, but indeed you have been specific as well.

Like I said (again, and again) after 15,000 posts and many revelations...one would truly have to be blind not to have seen them all.

This may be the only thing I respond to from your post, we'll see. No ascertainment is required of me. If you insist, that's on you.

I answered...and so have you. So be it.

Your decision is made, your fate sealed. So be it.