Search results

You and Mark both dodge my questions. You cannot give Scripture that teaches we can go on sinning and be saved. You guys that refuse to believe repentance is from sin, turn around and claim I'm teaching Sinless perfection. There is no teaching in the Bible. I guess Jesus gives mankind...

This really is the heart of the matter when it comes to the subject of repentance and why folks reject repentance from sin which is Biblical. They dont like the idea you must stop sinning to be saved. So they redefine what repentance is.

Well sir you are wrong then. What you are teaching me is that we can go on sinning and be saved eternally. Give book, chapter, and verse for that belief?

Thanks Nancy, Johan attacked me claiming I'm using the verse out of context. All I was doing is showing a verse where God does not approve of willful sin. Johan demands that verse can only be applied to Jewish converts who start to fall away from Christ. God does not approve of any willful sin...

Amazing Mark liked that teaching all sin is willfull sin. Hey Mark you dodged my question and ran off. Thanks for coming on here to create confusion and not give any clarity. Paul's sins against Jesus and His followers were done in ignorance, 1Timothy 1:13, - though formerly I was a blasphemer...

Matthew 26:28 ; Acts 2:38, - this is my blood of the covenant which is shed for many for the remission of sins - repent and let all of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins Same exact Greek words. Shedding of blood for what? Repentance and baptism for what?

No, there are sins of ignorance. Plenty of people in the world that dont know fornication is sin in the new testament. Look at the savages in the Amazon. They have no understanding of Gods new testament law.

ALL sin that is willfull in Gods new testament gospel is condemned by anyone, alien sinner or the born again. So isolated acts of sin that are willful dont apply to Hebrews 10:26? btw, I never said anything about isolated acts or apostasy which had nothing to do with my discussion with Mark...

That's all you can say? Next time I'd appreciate you not making comments on my posts if you're going to make accusations against me, without giving a reason why I'm wrongly dividing scripture.

How is using a verse that clearly condemns willfull sin which is the purpose for why I was using the verse out of context? Hebrews 10:26, - for if we sin willfully after that we have received the knowledge of truth no longer remains a sacrifice for sins How am I not stating what the passage...

Hebrews 10:26 - if we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth no sacrifice for sins is left Does the context show that willfull sin is condemned? It does, therefore my use of the verse is not taken out of context.

Does Hebrews 10:19-26 allow for willfull sin in CONTEXT?

If you are so above my understanding you wont have a problem answering my question.

No I did not. I wasn't trying to do study on Hebrews 10:19-25. I was only pointing out that God does not approve of continuance practicing sin. Any sin practiced WILLFULLY which it absolutely condemns.

You have not answered my question instead asked another question to me. Answer first

I'm not getting into a exegesis of Hebrews 10:26-27 with you. The only point I am making is the Bible is clear we are not to go on sinning. Can we agree that is what Hebrews 10:26-27 is condemning?

Now answer my question, Did the son repent by going to do the work in the vineyard or could he have repented by not working in the vineyard?

Hebrews 10:26-27, - if we deliberately go on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth no further sacrifice remains but only a fearful expectation of judgement and of raging fire that will consume all adversaries.

Here I am.

You are the one who is not willing or able to defend your interpretation of repentance. You asked to debate me, here I am.