Search results

Because of what I'm arguing. I'm arguing that Jesus becomes Lord over the earth when the kingdoms of the world become His(Revelation 11:15). It is Scriptue interpreting Scripture. Why would you have an issue with doing that? I'm not saying that Zech 14:9 records it in that manner. I'm saying, in...

You are all over the place here. How is one to make any sense of some of this? You seem to be arguing for and against the NHNE at the same time, in relation to the millennium. I can't make sense out of what your position is.

Let's see if you are being fair and reasonable or just cherry picking , though. IOW, do your take your own advice you give others when your own advice is handed back to from someone else? Let's see what you do or not do with my post I just submitted to you, post #96. After all, it is a blatant...

Speaking for myself, I fully agree. So likewise, since the topic of thread is Zechariah 14... Please study and compare all three, and you will discover that "B + C" are simultaneous events of the Lord’s kingdom, but they are not true until "A" is no longer true, and that an era of time is...

I'm not entirely certain whether you are correct about the the papacy or not. But pretty much everything else I tend to agree with you about. History is not one of my things. Therefore, I wouldn't have the insight you might have. Nothing wrong with knowing and studying history. I leave things...

A falling away---apostasy---must happen first, and the man of sin, the antichrist, will be revealed. This immediately tells us who Paul is talking about people who turn away from the truth they once knew. They have 'all deceivableness of unrighteousness'---open to lies and deception. They...

On the surface it sounds reasonable, but does the text in Zechariah 14 agree? I think not. Because if it did you should be able to show how, for example---and the lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee, have anything to do one way or the other with events in the first century, in...

Was that post addresed to you? Absolutely not. I simply sibmitted what I said and how one Amil in particular responded to it, which wasn't you, to an an Ai and that is what the AI concluded from the exchange. The Amil meant by the AI is meaning the Amil that was addressing my post, and not you...

Of course both exist since not everyone in the naos falls away. At some point the naos needs spiritually cleansed, thus that is explained in Daniel 8, for one. Except a lot of interpreters take those things in the literal sense and apply it to A4E. As if the naos meant in 2 Thessalonians 2:4...

Your reasoning of things is somewhat bizarre at times. First you argue that the first coming was kept secret. Then use Mat. 13:35 to make your point. Which would then mean no one could know the exact time of the first coming until Jesus reveals it to them. Except the first coming has already...

Revelation 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, Revelation 22:3 And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and...

Here's an interesting snippet from a session I had with Chatgpt earlier, the fact you bring up 2 Peter 3:10-13. But not because of what you brought up. I never saw this post of yours when I had that session earlier. I'm not asking Chatgpt these things because I don't know the answers myself. I...

IOW.... 1. Establish the epistemic hierarchy Amil first sets the rules for who can “know” prophecy. For example: Rule 1: Human thoughts ≠ God’s thoughts (Isa. 55:8-9). Rule 2: Only the Spirit discerns spiritual truths (1 Cor. 2). Effect: This frames the conversation so that any conclusion...

I don't know why some disagree that maybe Daniel 8 can be useful here? A lot of interpreters are convinced A4E is in view. But I'm, not convinced of that. And very few even want to explore it, likely based on Past Commentators brainwashing them into thinking A4E is meaning the little horn in...

Had Chatgpt throw the following together for me Comparison of Interpretations in Zechariah 14 VerseLiteral / Second Coming InterpretationSpiritualized / Pentecost Interpretation 14:4 The Lord's feet physically stand on the Mount of Olives, causing it to split. Cataclysmic event; nations...

Zechariah 14:4–5 says: 4 And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives… and the mount of Olives shall cleave… and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south. 5 And ye shall flee to the valley of the...

This is literally one of the funniest things I have ever heard. That someone is complaining about an alleged false teaching then in the same breath literally inserts an undeniably false teaching of their own---It's A Man Made Lie Preparing The Unexpecting To Receive The Future "False Christ" In...

You are the one all over the place in Zechariah 14, not me. In verse 4 you have Jesus standing upon the mount of Olives before He went to the cross. In spite of, that verse 3 is pertaining to the wrath of God and the DOTL, and that verse 5 pertains to His 2nd coming. And I'm all over the place...

Is he a JW? I thought all JWs were Premil, except he is Amil. JWs are a cult. You can't have some of them being Amil and some being Premil. That's not how religious cults operate.

It's mind blowing enough that there could be one being that has no beginning. I can't even comrehend how that is even possible to have always existed without a beginning. I don't question it, I just can't comprehend it. Imagine there then being 3 beings with no beginning. That's what has always...