Search results

2:19 σὺ πιστεύεις ὅτι ὁ θεός εἷς ἐστιν καλῶς ποιεῖς· καὶ τὰ δαιμόνια πιστεύουσιν καὶ φρίσσουσιν Thou thyself trusts how a God the one is. Being what is good, thou does it. Even some demons they are trusting it and they are shuddering [at] it. Further along is thus, [Jas 2:21 NKJV] 21 Was not...

Only in the English language. Thus, the protestant say faith always has loyal works, hence sola fide. And you would say as a Roman Catholic that your faith has to be directed right. But pistis and fide are not the word which is on every federal reserve note. Now if you think the federal reserve...

Faith is a word that did not exist [back] then, and you only prove my point. Consideration without trust is not worthless, but it is more difficult. But this has nothing to do with my point as usual of yours.

Lexicons are known to be wrong, and since James says there is pistis without works, then pistis is not defined by a work or works, i.e. labor.

Yes, and the answer is that pistis does not mean obedience.

Interesting statement.

Let us hope it isn't freezing rain either.

To me, it is both covenants in their most practical form.

Do you really think you are safe or rescued? You can't argue that people are safe when they die, but you can argue for a version OSAS after someone dies. Edit: I am also stretching the definition of the word saved, but it is used in video games.

Other things are more likely too. But if I am not battling for the interpretation that the law is most important thing in the bible, what good would I be?

I don't believe these are still good shibboleths. Evil ones are more likely to object to the law.

I wonder if it can do that, but they give quotes of a verse in a TR form. Biblehub is also good, but not as versatile.

Has a reverse interlinear of the KJV and perhaps other translations which it covers. Has awesome Greek and Hebrew tools.

The [evil] will be sons of God with God as their father as punishment. hlo

He can use.... .... the BLB

Can I mention Revelation 21:17? "He that overcome shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son."

But pistis and fide are cognates for Greek and Latin. But most Roman Catholics don't know Greek, so you would ignore this.

No, it is because you are moron who defines faith as more than trust. But it is a horrible translation of a word which means trust.

This has nothing to do with your protestant definition of faith which you hold to. :gd But if you are not a socialist, then you aren't a trusting Catholic Christian. :gd

Fidelity is not the same in Latin sir. It is just trust or belief. You are pushing the meaning of the word beyond its limits like a Protestant.