Search results

A civil-war https://archive.org/details/civil-see-evil-war-state-of-rui-nation-by-brother-aaron-earnest_202301

Catholicism constantly claim to speak of 'spiritual' things, when in reality it simply means the over-literalization, or naturalization of spiritual things (like Revelation), and the mythologization of natural things (like Genesis), just as the early mistaken thoughts of the Jews; and so are...

Since when is the 7th day the shadow? I read in scripture: Pro_6:23 For the commandment is a lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life: As far as I read, Jesus keeps the 7th day, being the Lord of the Sabbath, and began the gospel on the very day (Luk...

Actually the Cross belongs to God (first), and pagans (devil) stole the idea: See APPENDIX 9 (page 526-550)- Michael The Archangel Who Is Like Unto God The Highest Messenger (BOOK) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

https://archive.org/details/study-07-daniel-prophecies-overview-then-now-and-yet-to-come_202301/STUDY%2001%20%E2%80%93%20WHAT%20IS%20TRUTH/mode/1up

The 7 Trumpets Complete Study (Download the Powerpoint, not PDF, as the IA messes up formatting for PDF) https://archive.org/details/the-seven-trumpets-of-revelation/The%20Seven%20Trumpets%20Of%20Revelation%20-%20Revelation%208vs2%20-%2011vs19%20Part%2001%20-%20Introduction%20A/

https://archive.org/details/michael-the-archangel-who-is-like-unto-god-the-highest-messenger_202407/page/n3/mode/1up

No, the topic you want to discuss is fine elsewhere to engage in, but just not for this thread. The topic is specific to what was given in the OP, and I do not desire to have it sidelined, as I think it is important on it's own.

Actually no. The OP is clear. The topic is specifically and only about the erroneous doctrine of "una substantia" and "perfectly one superabound", or the nature, not questioning the numerical (3, or eternal Heavenly Trio).

"ouija" (occultic), from French, "oui", "yes", and German, "ja", "yes" - ouija | Search Online Etymology Dictionary

You are off on a non-sequitur tangent that has nothing (no thing) to do with the OP. John 17:21 has nothing to do with the topic. John 17:21-23 deals not with "substance" (nature), but rather with 'heart/spiritual' (togetherness of mind).

The Poll can have only so many responses, and there is no more room, and I would not add that statement, even if I had room. Changing from Latin to Greek does not aide the conversation, any more than changing locations from this forum to another, and continuing. The problem with "una...

No, they got it from Tertullian.

You misunderstood the OP, and what I stated in reply. The OP is about the specific Roman Catholic dogma of "una substantia" (one substance), not the phrase in John 17.

Excellent try, but that is not what "una substantia", nor "perfectly one superabound" means definitionally according to Roman Catholicism. If John 17:22 were to teach "una substantia", "perfectly one superabound", it would teach that the disciples (Apostles) themselves are of the same nature...

Roman Catholicism has a doctrine of "una substantia", "perfectly one superabound" in regards "elohiym" - show 1 verse in scripture which teaches it. This thread and poll is not about denying the Persons/Beings of the Father, and of the Son (Jesus Christ), and of the Holy Ghost/Spirit. This...

A person indeed can, just as Saul and Ananias/Sapphira.

Who said he was standing in the first place?

They ("The unrighteous") sure do ("practice sin"), when they don't keep the Ten Commandments (Rom. 7:7; Jam. 2:8-13; 1 Jhn. 3:4), and teach others to transgress any one of them (as you do about the Sabbath (Exo. 20:8-11), thus transgressing them all together, Jam. 2:10), as Jesus said (Mat...