Search results

Right, and then that nonsense was addressed and debunked, just like all the rest of your nonsense, so did you have an answer?

You're admittedly not even interested in engaging with the claims I backed up. Why are you asking for claims to be backed up that you're not even willing to engage with? You make no sense.

OK Why do you need to inform me of that, then? Go away.

Interesting, because Paul uses that same verse in his exposition of the Gospel to the Roman Church. No, 3000 were saved on that day--of the very same people Peter says crucified Jesus. It can be both condemnation and salvation--same thing Paul says ("God is righteous to condemn your sin" and...

I don't really want to change the topic--you have a way of changing the topic.

Are you saying you think you knew as much on the day you received the Spirit as you do today? Granted, it's the same nonsense, I'm sure, but you know a lot more nonsense today, right? LOL!

Nope, I already proved Peter preached much more than that, you have just decided to act as if I hadn't. Also, Peter and Paul cited the same verse "whoever calls on the Name of the LORD shall be saved"--they preached the same Gospel, as I have detailed.

Go make a thread on your topic, stop being off-topic on my thread.

Romans 7:1-6 says the Jewish believer is free from his obligation to serve God by the Law BECAUSE HE HAS DIED. How did the Jewish believer achieve death? "Through the body of Messiah"--ie, through being unified with Christ through faith. Yeah... buddy, how do you think we are baptized into His...

Nah, he said God is saving a remnant of Israel today, and is doing it by grace (Ro 11)--and Paul preached salvation by Grace through faith, and, thus, those Jews who believed in his message of grace were part of the remnant of Israel being saved.

You really are a Black Hebrew Israelite, aren't you?

You emptily assert it, but the evidence, IMO--the evidence I pointed to--goes the other way. It really would have been a sin for Peter to have EATEN with Gentiles, because "Israel is a nation that dwells alone", etc, but that was over now, because the Gentiles were accepted, and the division was...

So, you don't think they're eating the body of Christ, and drinking His blood, so that He is in them and they are in Him (John 6)?

The Law didn't change? Incest used to be a holy command (Gen 1), now, it is a work of the devil. Keeping vows used to be a holy command, now, it is of the evil one (Mt 5; Ja 5).

You really think that that little snippet is an answer to what I wrote? It isn't.

No, I reject the IC, bc it is founded upon the erroneous belief that Mary is the New Eve, just as I explained in the OP.

Yeah, actually, he does : the ones who are "in Christ" have "no condemnation" (Ro 8:1), but the one who does not walk in faith "is condemned" (Ro 14:23)--meaning they are not abiding in Christ. Paul says "walk in the spirit and you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh"--he also critiques...

Yep, they are the referent of "the spirits of righteous men made perfect"--they were just, and in right standing with God, but they were not made perfect until the inauguration of the New Covenant, but they were waiting, because the blood of bulls and goats cannot take sins away, but men had...

Go make a thread about it; I'll be waiting on MY thread to hear discussion on MY topic. Stop speaking garbage, engage the topic.

Yeah, the Marian dogma of the immaculate conception was declared ex-cathedra--that doctrine rests on the foundation of Mary as the New Eve, but Mary is not the New Eve.