Search results

Thank you for your comments. I will certainly try and explain my interpretations that you might still consider in error... I just know how much discussion is necessary to support these view and are included in the commentary I recently released on Amazon. If you would like an author's copy -...

Part 2: ) The Messiah will strike ONLY the feet of the image and break into pieces the clay and the iron components ONLY. The clay represent His people subjugated by the Roman Empire - symbolically encased in iron and sitting at the end of their feet. Totally at their mercy. The Jews expected...

Part 1. Thanks for your comments!! As I mentioned, ALL interpreters contend these two verses happen at the same time - at the end of time. It took me quite a bit of time for me to discover these are the two separate comings of the Lord. That was because the interpretations within the later...

Thank you. I am sure you are aware that everyone believes that 2:34 and 2:35 represent the Messiah striking the image and destroying it completely at the end times. But it is my belief that 2:34 represents the Messiah’s first coming where He strikes the feet and breaks apart the IRON AND THE...

Ronald, if you do not mind, would you be willing to present your interpretations for verses 11:5 - 7? Thanks. Chapter 11 is / was the most difficult chapter by far to interepret.

Thank you very much! God bless!!!!

Without researching this, I would say the NC was a replacement / a better covenant that was originally given to Moses on Mt. Sinai. Since it is a better covenant to His people, I would say it was given to them. Now, the covenant given to Moses was so Israel would learn, study, obey all of God's...

This is how I interpret these verses in Daniel...... for what it is worth. Daniel 7:4-8; 4The first was like a lion, and had eagle’s wings. I watched till its wings were plucked off; and it was lifted up from the earth and made to stand on two feet like a man, and a man’s heart was given to...

Not sure.. but Genesis 3:15 might be the first… ???

I don't want to come across as to push anyone to acquire my commentary on Daniel or accept my interpretations, but I would like to give you folks within this forum a snapshot of the Preface at the beginning of the Book. Even if you do not want to read all of the 398 pages or even most of them...

There is absolutely no doubt that all Gentiles who accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior will enter His Kingdom. But take a look at Jeremiah before the cross - 31“Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—...

Don't understand this... What do you meant a "spiritual thinking?" The cross was certainly not only physical but more than symbolic. It demonstrates the forgiveness of our sins should we place our faith in the Messiah. The Messiah took on the sin of the world and paid the price of death. But He...

I think the verses in Jeremiah are quite clear.

Part 4. I certainly agree with some of this! But I believe it was the "divided" 4th kingdom of papal Rome that appropriated His church and offered a very different gospel. Their church looked nothing like the church that Paul started. Can you imagine Paul believing that a pope of the 4th...

Part 3. No, please see above. No, and this is one of the most important finds / interpretations within Daniel. Chapter 2:34 and 2:35 are believed by EVERYONE to represent the stone striking the feet of the image and destroying all 4 kingdoms. And this will occur in conjunction with 2:35 at the...

Part 2. Absolutely not. There are very few verses in these chapters that deal with the first 3 kingdoms. The majority of these verses focus on the 4th kingdom of Rome (pagan or papal). In Chapter 11, only verses 1-4 speak of the kingdoms before pagan Rome. However, if you try to match those...

Part 1. I do agree with the historical records that Rome is the 4th kingdom beast. And, it was the kingdom in place at the time of the Messiah. I agree with this. There are perhaps 3 main interpretations on the timing of the start of the prophecy. Two are the different decree's by Artaxerxes...

Thanks.

I know He was but He was our Passover Lamb and would take on the sin of the world and would be considered “unclean” and “ abomination” in Levitical law. Just because it says”end times” does not necessarily mean “true end times.” Just like “tree” does not mean a literal tree all the time. If...

I agree. It was God's prophecy about the restoration of His people and His city back from Babylon. He revealed the start of the 70 weeks of years period, identified the 3 sections of the prophecy and what would be restored in each and by whom, He revealed the timing of His coming on the first...