Search results

Why do you believe that... a.) Because I was taught it. b.) Because everyone else believes it. c.) Because I like it since it sounds cool. d.) Because the Catholics have never been right about anything so maybe they are right here.

The text does not say Jesus is God. I mean God knew how to say it. It does not seem to be hard to write.

If you are the image of yourself. Then there's only one of you.

The problem with that is the Bible does not say Jesus was 100 percent God and a 100 percent man.

Those are not a teaching. Those are pieces (in this case 7 of them) that are scattered all over the New Testament. And again all of them are twisted. Here for an example I will do John 8:58 At the last super, the disciples were trying to find out who would deny the Christ. They said literally...

I'm looking for a teaching on it from the Scriptures. New or Old Testament.

You quote to me what the unbelievers said. That the Jews of the New Testament said no one but God can forgive sins. That's what you put in front of me. I don't know if I should laugh or cry.

Something this big and this important and especially if it's required for salvation. Then it should have been taught by someone. Whole paragraphs or chapters should be able to be read where it is clearly stated. And there's no such teaching anywhere in the entire Bible. Not by the Jews or the...

The Bible says that Jesus Christ is the “image of God” Colossians 1:15; 2 Corinthians 4:4). If Christ is the image of God, then he cannot be God because a person cannot be himself and an image of himself at the same time. Jesus can be called the “image” of God because he always did the will of...

Isa 6:1-10 6 In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. God showed him a vision. He did not literally see something real. It was a vision given by revelation. Moses asked God if he could see him. And God said...

No because nobody ever saw God.

This one is really hard to answer isn't it? I mean there really is not even one place in the entire Bible where it's taught using a whole section meaning a chapter or even a couple paragraphs.

The book of Matthew states Jesus had the ability to forgive sins. It does not say anything about God. Matthew 9:6 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins,

There's no lie from me. It's not taught anywhere. Look at your post above. You're using pieces (in your case 4 different sections of Scripture) that are statements scattered all over the New and Old Testament. There has never been a teaching on it anywhere in the Bible. The Jews never saw it...

Lord: Mighty, principal ruler. He who assumes and exercises the power, while really possesses it as unlimited. Refers to Christ, and denotes his position of master in relation to his people, as he who has ownership and authority over them. Has the right and authority to institute, and command...

I believe the following is a very evil statement.. (the Holy Spirit of God is also the Spirit of Christ Jesus);

Most of the church was breaking up while Paul was still alive. Probably by the Catholics or what later became the Catholics.

Look at your own writing. And yes there was a perfect man Only a perfect, sinless man could be the unblemished sacrifice that is required for the propitiation of sin. Thorough an imperfect man, sin entered the world and infected us ALL. Conversely, only through a perfect man could sin be...

There has never been a teaching on it anywhere in the Bible. The Jews never saw it anywhere in the entire Old Testament nor anyone in the New Testament ever taught it. The Catholics who invented this nonsense have used only about 8 verses that they have to piece together from statements that are...

The Word of the Lord came unto me when I was getting a cup of tea saying Gentiles are unbelievers and Christians are believers. Therefore there's no such thing as an unbeliever-believer.