Search results

God does not agree with you. He writes nothing about Gentiles remaining Gentiles after becoming Christian. Now you think that. You understand it in your mind and it makes perfect sense to you. God does not share your concept and He never writes about Gentile Christians.

Well, Big Boy Johnson... we agree on this one.

What did it accomplish to have God come as a man? (That is not even possible. How does a dog come as a cat?) Oh good Lord, help me ask the question. What did it produce to have God come down as a God-Man? Why did He do it?

This is what's going to happen when you get to heaven. And that I'm not even sure if you will make it there. But if you do this is what you will say... "You know Augustin56, that kid Peterlag was right all along and I was following the biggest cult on Earth and I really thought I was the one...

I am not lust or sin. I'm the righteousness of God in Christ. (In Christ means in the spirit) 2 Corinthians 5:21 ...the righteousness of God in him. 14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. I am not drawn away of my own lust and enticed. I am in Christ...

We are both saying the same thing. You say your group are the experts with education. I say I'm an expert without the PhD's. You say the Jewish leaders thought they were right. I say the Jewish rulers had the PhD's and Jesus, the Apostles, and me did not have the PhD's.

Can I have the Scripture that says I'm a Jew or a Gentile?

The Apostles and Jesus without the education were also claiming to be the expert. Can you give me any Catholic doctrine that lines up with Scripture?

Well, let's look at your verse. Where in it does it say the Gentiles were Christian at birth? Where?

The reason I cannot lust in the flesh when following after the spirit is because it's impossible to do so since the spirit of Christ does not lust after the flesh. Religious people don't follow after the spirit, but rather they follow after their flesh and call it spiritual. The religious folks...

The priests with PhD's in theology said the same thing to Jesus and the Apostles. We are great men of learning and do you dare teach us they said. And what did Jesus tell them? That they were of their father the devil.

What Paul teaches in the Epistles which is the doctrine for Christians and what the Catholics teach are two completely doctrines. Here's a few examples... There is a trinity Paul ............. No Catholics ... Yes Dead people are alive Paul ............. No Catholics ... Yes God is in control...

Is it high-jacked or hijacked? I saw it in print both ways. This was indeed hard for me to try to get a date when the Catholics started because much of the Internet is Catholic saying it started with Peter. I came across some writings around 80 AD where holy water was first being written about...

John 1:1 Jesus Christ is not a lexical definition of logos. The verse does not say "In the beginning was Jesus." The "Word" is not synonymous with Jesus, or even the "Messiah." The word logos in John 1:1 refers to God's creative self-expression... His reason, purpose and plans, especially as...

My point was the Catholics founded it. Probably around the 3rd to 5th century.

The problem with that is that the Catholics high-jacked the Christian church early on and I think it was around 60 or 80 AD. Right after all Apostles were gone and I would not be surprised if it was Catholics that helped to kill them.

Right now I'm working on sin nature because I just learned a few years ago that the Catholics started that one to.

The trinity is their flag ship. I use it as a gauge that tells me if they believe it then it's probably wrong.

He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked. Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. The Greek word menō translated "abide" often deals with being in him, which I'm very concerned about when it comes to...

It's not just Mary. I can't think of anything the Catholics teach that's correct.