Search results

This was addressed to the original poster, not you. I already know your thoughts on this and didn't need you to respond.

To the OP, does this poll take into account situations where there is no chance for the fetus to live and either it or the pregnancy is killing the mother? I'm talking about medical abortions to save the life of the mother. I am all for adoption, but the fetus needs to be part the point of...

I just want to protect the medical abortions, not the other ones.

Which I understand, but abortions for medical reasons need to be protected. If the life of the mother is in danger due to the pregnancy, she needs to be protected.

As stated, I am a moderate. You can kindly stop misrepresenting me now. I am and you, per the rules of this forum, do not get to question whether I am or not.

Maybe to some. I will be voting against him and DeSantis in 2024.

It gets so much airtime because people need to always be reminded that not all abortions are for convenience. We have people who continually say no abortion for any reasons at all, ever. They need to be reminded that sometimes the mother's life is at risk and, why have two deaths when there only...

Eh! I'm still here, still alive, and still doing what I do. I am not concerned. Nothing we can control anyway. So, I tend not to worry about things I cannot control.

And inflation will end and the dollar will go back. That is what I am trying to say. I have seen this happen over and over in my 48 years of walking this earth.

It goes down and it goes up and it goes down and it goes up. It's a cycle. Nothing has changed except that more people are falling for the doomsayers.

Here are your own words, "It’s all murder. what’s the difference?" I was trying to get you to think of the difference. It is all about intent.

So if an abortion is medically needed sobthat the life of the mother is preserved, you are against that?

I am not going to respond in this thread again as I am tired of having to repeat myself over and over again.

He didn't steal the election.

I have stated and stand by what I have said before, that even if the number is less than 1% of all abortions, abortions for medical reasons must be protected. I do not support abortion on-demand and never have. I have heard both sides, so you're assumption is incorrect. I have seen with my own...

I will concede that he has some control, but not ultimate control over prices. He has closed some and yet recently approved one in Alaska: https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-oil-drilling-biden-young-voters-2024-ced25e724ea71d8dba8f78de18901093

This is not true. I have transported women to the hospital who have had to have abortions to save their life. Your article is from a pro-life website. Post something more neutral.

God bless you too!

That is part of it and Biden has no control over oil prices. OPEC+ is the culprit there. The oil/gas companies are the culprits there. They are making record profits off the people, yet you never here Republicans talk of that. Nope, right to blaming Biden.