Search results

Hope you do not mind, but I have never heard anyone say that before. Especially, verses 41-43. What is your take on 2:34-35?

With the exception of Chapter 11, Chapter 2 might just be the most difficult chapter to unpack and interpret in the Book of Daniel. So, does anyone have a particular verse or series of verses that just seem to defy understanding.... they would like to throw out to the community?

Please consider the following... Daniel 9:24 outlines six key objectives that the Messiah would accomplish, and the order in which they are listed follows a logical progression. First, the Messiah is said to "finish transgression," which means addressing humanity's rebellion against God. Next...

Okay!

And what? First ----"And what? What are you trying to say? Secondly, so you are trying to say that God should not have given us any of the time elements in His prophecies because that would constitute our attempting to find out when He is coming?

Please consider the following... Daniel 9:24 outlines six key objectives that the Messiah would accomplish, and the order in which they are listed follows a logical progression. First, the Messiah is said to "finish transgression," which means addressing humanity's rebellion against God. Next...

Please consider the following new interpretation. Look forward to your thoughts... Almost all the time prophecies in the Book of Daniel have been interpreted by applying the year-for-a-day principle. This includes the seven "times" found in Chapter 4, the "time, times, and half a time" in...

If I may, the NC was not a 7 year covenant... This ties in perfectly with the rest of Chapter 9. It was DURING this last "set aside" week that the Messiah would confirm the covenant. God has never entered into a "limited" covenant with mankind... They have been conditional, but He has always...

Oh, I have not heard that interpretation before. I am aware that approximately 99.99 % of folks have thrown the last week some 2000 years in the future, but not a literal 70 weeks. If you do not minc, can you tell me when this prophecy begins and ends and how the elements in 9"24-27 materialize...

It is clear that God has presented His prophecies in two distinct parts: a dream sequence and an interpretation sequence. Similar to the depiction of the four kingdoms in the metal-man image, the three sections of time in Daniel’s seventy weeks of years prophecy (7 weeks, 62 weeks, and 1 week)...

Thanks Dougg.

Oh my! I just clicked onto your site that you provided… I understand your interpretation on 9:27 …

Looking forward to discussing your interpretations…

Hey, wait a minute my friend, don’t you want to offer and discuss your interpretations? What are your interpretations on 9:27? What is your definition of the AOD and why? Look forward to hearing from you.

Dougg, Chapter 11 is indeed universally understood to speak of the post Alexander period PRIOR to the start of pagan Rome. But Chapter 11 has nothings my to do with that period of our history or those people such as AE, the Ptolemy’s and the Seleucid’s. But this is the most difficult chapter...

11:14 is indeed the latter days… it means the time of the Messiah, not the end times in chapter 12. Pagan Rome was indeed the 4th kingdom and was the kingdom at the time of the Messiah. The end of chapter 11 discusses the little horn (papacy) who would come to power. He would indeed continue...

does Luke negete that AOD is the cross or the cause of the desolation? Does it negete the connection to Daniel with Matthew and Mark? Do you believe the physical destruction of the city, the Temple is the cause of the desolation? The Babylonians had already completely destroyed everything...

I did not realize we were so far apart on what is the AOD... but that is okay. But once again, Jesus mentioned to His disciples to look who is standing in the holy place (Matthew), or is standing where he should not be (Mark)... that is a man standing there AND they will soon come to the time of...

Dougg, you obviously have an issue with the SDA... but my interpretations are indeed my own. The SDA would certainly not accept any of the very different interpretations that relate to the 5 time elements found in Daniel. Again, every response you make is all about the future. You are...

Dougg, I have already given you a very detailed interpretation of this... if you do not agree with it then please provide your reasoning for your disagreement... that is no problem. But to just come back with the same comment without any support - it really it just you saying so... sorry, but...