Search results

I'm curious. How do you feel capitalism failed the working class? (and by that I mean the textbook definition of capitalism)

Would you elaborate on that in a little more detail please?

That's one of the longest assembly of words equating to a non answer I have ever seen. Again, what specifically did you do (In terms of tools and techniques) to spiritually discern this event you say happened?

you speak of yourself

No, but that begs the question. What cult's doctrines do you adhere to?

Pay more attention, I have several times

Just curious, how do you come up with this "stuff' that is so far from whats actually written that it borders on deliberate misrepresentation?

You are going to take some time to straighten out

Oh good grief, here we go again The first is "Lord (H3068 Yhwh- self existent supreme one) thats correct- there is no other supreme God (H430 elohim) ( he was comparing Himself to Himself)- thats not a statement on Jesus the Son I already did the first few so not repeating That means what...

He did not change it, he defined it

Nothing about the truth is offensive to me and i have no argument or disagreement with whats written- just your waffling and obfuscation is annoying but not offensive.

Jesus is God, He is just not The father ( the Supreme God). That's what Scripture says. Two distinctly different entities with the Son subordinate to the father.

That's right and i corrected the first of the ones you posted as examples. The fact that you read and post scriptures out of context 'make any case except the one where you need to study more and pontificate less. I did refute it and quite effectively and ignoring it or pretending it isn't so...

No, I covered it Stop whining. If you have to run away because your points have no substance just go ahead and do it quietly and don't disturb the rest of us. If you can debate intelligently then you are invited to present and justify your points based on their content without all your melodrama.

If you are referring to me, I'm 1 person with 1 name posting 1 at a time on the subjects or points that I decide to.

Go to #12. I did the first ones. Didn't see the need for more variations of the same theme. They were all incorrectly interpreted then and still are. Do you really want the rest too? Would you actually benefit from it? You deliberately refused to understand the first corrections I did because...

I already answered that correctly and in detail- your rehashing it doesn't change anything

A good root search followed by a contextual and correlative examination.

again?

Yes and thats the same process. You really need a learning annex in hermeneutics.