Search results

That's an incorrect read on that Start at 19-21. The author is contrasting mans ability to enter the "holy" ( in the presence of God) under "law" as opposed as to through Jesus. That's the context for the rest of that. That "sacrifice' and things references were to the ceremonial sacrifices...

Yes, no question about it. To believe otherwise is to elevate the ability of man above the Power of God.

No, because I didn't take your out-of-context bait and called you on it No, you quote from dogma and like using impressive sounding words and very selectively avoiding a direct contradiction that even you know you will lose. I pointed one out so why don't you provide a complete verse without...

Exactly what i said earlier try this slight re translation Be fully saturated ( soaked through to a level of full understanding) in the "name" ( Who and what Jesus is and His sole ability as the living Son of God to Forgive Sin) of Jesus for the remission of sin ( that happens when we go to...

OK, in that case, the statement is false. Receiving the Spirit ( or being filled or any number of like references) in terms of having or not having is akin to the "Kings Seal" We don't "do" it and nobody "gives" it to us. God does it. This is also when the believer is written in the Book of...

That's all they needed

Before I comment, i want to make sure- are you referring to the ceremony of water baptism there?

Lets go one point at the time so nothing gets lost. "Ablution" was ( and still is) a common practice over there so the eunuch could have heard about it or witnessed it from innumerable sources. During that period of Acts, the believers were new and inexperienced so things like the Spirit were...

Fair enough, you stated Mk 16:16 Mar 16:16 He that believethG4100 andG2532 is baptizedG907 shall be saved;G4982 butG1161 he that believeth notG569 shall be damned.G2632 G907 is defined basically in Strongs as "to make whelmed' (saturated with something) and its common usage is in ceremonial...

Then you are contradicting your own words. For anything to constitute a "miracle" ( by the correct definition) it must meet certain criteria as established otherwise it isn't a miracle- just a random beating of a long odd. ( regardless of how religious sounding, warm and fuzzy or "beneficial"...

Stop talking in circles I asked ( to establish a starting point for beneficial dialog) now be a reasonable person and comply since i cant read minds

I didn't ask for stories, testimonies or claims ( you can get plenty of those with aliens, big foot and Nessie sometimes with footprints and fuzzy pictures too), I asked specifically for researched cases with actual evidence vetted by proper authority and published. Got any of those? Thanks

I am very familiar with that and your attempt at comparison relative to the subject is non sequitur. In Genesis it clearly says "us' and Jesus later identifies at the "word' with God and was God (in His own standing). That means they were both there and nobody disputes that. You create a...

The word translated into "trespass" (paraptoham) is generally used in reference to insults, failing to make a goal and things like that. Even "sin" ( the word) means to fall short then it becomes the specificity of the offense. We are to forgive the non dangerous or damaging ones ( even the...

Do you even recognize that which you don't fully understand? Where do you get this string of "beliefs' from? In your view, what must one do to be saved? ( good starting point) Thanks Have you ever actually applied proper study and reference techniques to the passages you reference? I say...

OK, define these "miracles" in clear concise detail with detailed information as to who witnessed them, vetted them and where they are so they can be tested and blind verified again. (discerned) First thing is: Are they actually "miracles" or just claims. Then we must remove any chance of any...

No, you have very little understanding of the actual language or cultural context and hold a traditional Anglo interpretation of things you dont fully grasp. In short, the Holy Spirit (Hagios Pneumo for the greek 40 &4151) is vital principle, holy breath essence combined (no direct English...

Do you have anything of substance or merit to contribute to the discussion? I did as i said earlier. You are simply hiding behind semantics to avoid the inescapable reality when the weakness of your non points is publically exposed. So, stop waffling and start actually refuting if possible...

The statements are the evidence. It might benefit you to do some research and see for yourself. After all, you have yet to scripturally disprove any of them so if my points are so weak- what does that say about yours since you cant seem to even refute 'nothing"?

Here's one, there is no reference to even the concept of a trinity in Greek or Hebrew traditions or teachings. It only starts appearing around 200 years AD. The transliteration errors come from a total lack of understanding of the Hebrew and Greek words. There is ONE God. There is ONE Son...