Search results

Hi Marymog Historical hearsay is still hearsay no matter how old it is and as far as @post, you would have to work hard to find a less reliable source of anything but its a free world

Stop whining, it just weakens your positions even further than your examples do. In verse 19, there is no correlation or link between "beasts of the field" and Eve so your attempt at linking is non sequitur I'm not making any statement against your 'character'- just your posts and their...

No, just another in a long list of your errors in 2:23 the word is "kawraw" which is more correctly used as identification of a class, division, type etc. in 3:20 kawraw is followed by "shem" which is a proper name. A better analogy would be he defined her from just being a truck to being...

Read verse 16. Its right there in wide open space. Jesus affirms that in 17 when he says that didn't come from him but from God and its that foundation (rock ) that Jesus is the living Son of God thats the foundation of the church. Not some dude named Peter

stop whining and again, what difference does it make?

On the person? No. It was founded on the "rock" (foundation) of what was said- not on any single human being.

That's a circumstance they are born into and what difference does it make?

But do you have a cogent, coherent and presentable thought or premise? Everything you post is disjointed, incomplete and virtually incomprehensible in terms of any single thought.

Do you really have such a weak grounding in the fundamentals of Jesus or are you here instigating? I'll be glad and I'm sure others here would too to help you if you need information but I am starting to suspect you have other motives.

Its street address and website is where?

So you say. Looks like rambling to me. The old clanging cymbal

How exactly did you discern these things to be sure they were in fact of the Lord?

Your "point" is blunted and mushroomed

and what "church" would that be?

And your point is? Jesus was born in a manger. Again, what definition of equal are you using to compare them against.

To be fair, they in fact are "born equal" in many ways but that begs a qualification so what definition or other criteria are you assigning so that individual equality at birth can be measured against?

Yes and surely you know the difference between "detailed" and things like 'comprehensive" or "exhaustive". You might benefit in more detailed reading and maybe asking for clarification rather than inferring and jumping to even more unfounded conclusions- you have enough of them already.

It can be an imperative as much as it can simply be an admonishment, recommendation or simply instruction. ( or any combination) And given that when he spoke there was no NT , he was referring to the OT and in context scriptures pointing to him as the Messiah ( which He did numerous times)...

I made no such "indication" of being an "accomplished student" of Paul. You jumped to yet another unfounded conclusion. ( especially with only 2 studies and not stating a purview of those studies) I answered it in kind and properly given the context. You brought it up, I am just going to fix...

You need to take that up with whoever told that to you. Without knowing "who" ( or what) this "church" is or what they have allegedly "figured out"- I wouldn't touch it.