Search results

Well that is a cite that I clearly said was a quote I would tend to agree with you that they are not commemorative in the millennial kingdom which this describes. But the issue is that there will be temple in the millennial kingdom, there will be sacrifices done in the temple in the millennial...

I cannot help if you arew offended for bveing called out. I have no issue that Jew and Gentile are one body in Christ since Pentecost and until the rapture. That is the bible and a mystery in th eold revealed in the new. but to call the church the new Israel of God is what is slanderous...

Let me post the full text of the verses I had to omit due to length reasons: Romans 11:25-29 King James Version 25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness...

I have studied annexationism YOu begin this reply with a human example with a big may! But the Bible says different. You redefine Gods Word when it speaks of eternal suffering of people. Why should I accept your words as literal and not retranslate them according to some belief someone...

Yes right now the church is the focus of Gd as was prophesied in the OT& where god also prophesied that He would temporarily set aside Israel for the ingathering of the gentiles, then fulfill all the promises He made to the twelve tribes known as Jews and Israel. True, but that does not make...

YOur opinions are not new. You have merely parroteed the thoughts of myriads of others who have come and gone. Have you submitted these3 thoughts to a local pastor for authentication? They are the gift god gave the church to mature the saints. Do you even belong to a local assembly and sit...

Except you are saying we stay saved by goods works which is unbiblical. We stay saved by Jesus alone and the good works a believer does is the result of salvation. Throughout Pauls writings He speaks of rewards for good works but not "staying saved". The bible gives two explicit descriptions...

So Jesus says no man can pluck one out of His hands but you say that this verse says a man can pluck himself. So those who walk away are not men. Heb. 13:5 says Jesus will never leave us nor forsake us. but, according to your thinking, if I choose to walk away He will leave and forsake me...

I do not need to know how long or short annihilationism declares life to last after the lake of fire. Teh bible calls it for eternity and that is enough. There is nothing in the Scriptures that says the lake of fire is a slow ands painful death. Bodies tossed in a high high heat die...

YOu would need to cite some source to prove your point. But Jesus forbade Mary in the garden to touch Him for He told her He had not yet gone to heaven (John 20:17) But yet He told the thief that on that day (Friday) he would be with Jesus in paradise. So either Jesus was lying to teh thief...

Wrong! We have already seen that the antichrist and false prophet exist in the lake of fire for 1,000 years and still alive. We see these who take the mark suffer for eternity and have no rest . No matter how others try to reinterpret this- people live in th elake of fire. Death and the...

No, I do take a book that has symbols and know there is much literal truth there as well! Even symbolic things have literal truth behind them. But I follow what is known as the golden rule of bible Understanding: When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense...

YOu add assumptions to the revelation passage that says they have no rest and their torment lasts forever. The dead know no torment nor are they conscious of rest or not. 1 the word destroy in Matt. 28, has 2 meanings in the original. One is to cause to cease to exist, the other is to ruin...

The view came from a gross misreading and misunderstanding of Scripture. It doe not take into account all passages concerning the topic of who is saved or not, but just focuses on certain passages. Same with those who do not hold to eternal suffering. They look at words with a 21st Century...

Remember this is the world. The GOP is not the church. As Christians we would object. But the GOP is not our Savior nor our goal as believers. We take what is good and reject what is not.

By what authority do you allegorize this verse and make it mean something other than what the normal usual meaning of the Words mean? The bible, plainly, clearly and unambiguously call them men- why you don't is beyond me. I take it then that you do not believe in progressive revelation...

If the garden was still on earth by the time of Noah, yes it was destroyed. We know by the time of the flood, the tree of life was back in heaven. For everything on the earth was destroyed by the flood. Well you can take it up wioth the Jews of Jesus day. For they called Abrahams Bosom...

Given that the term "Jew" means anyone of the twelve tribes colloquially, your point is moot. The true Israel of God is all saved from each of the 12 tribes. Period. You have no authority or right to redefine the terms of Scripture and tamper with the prophecies God made to the nation of...

True Israelites ARE THE SAVED FROM THE 12 TRIBES- NOT SAVED GENTILES WHO ARE ONE WITH SAVED JEWS AND WE FORM THE ONE BODY OF CHRIST. yOU CANNOT REWRITE THE PROPHECIES TO MAKE THEM MEAN CHRISTIANS.

Okay. As Paul is giving an agricultrue example, let us keep with it. A farmer plants a field of corn.-- He prepared the soil and then put the seed in. He must water and care and weed the field so the seed may grow. As it grows he must do what he can to keep critters away and continue to...