Search results

This statement makes no sense. The Holy Spirit is God and all Scripture is given by inspiration of God (including copies). Before 1 Timothy 3:16-17 is 1 Timothy 3:15 whereby Paul says to Timothy that he has known the holy Scriptures since he was a child. Pop quiz: Was Timothy the keeper of...

But you don’t have a perfect Bible and so then what is your basis for ultimate spiritual truth? How do determine if you have correct doctrines if you don’t have a perfect Bible?

Not at all because Psalms 12:6-7 says the words of the Lord are purified seven times (which lines up with the different KJB editions). It is just like a believer and the Sanctification Process that he/she goes through. They may not mature right away in the faith, but in time they do where...

How do you define the gospel? Does this gospel include water baptism? If there is no initial salvation, how does one first get saved? Do you believe you have salvation? If so, what did you do to merit that?

In regards between the 1611 to the 1900 Cambridge Edition involving the MAJOR KJB Editions: This would be more like purifications and not actual changes. These so called changes (updates or purifications) were very small. Checking a second hand KJB is PCE before purchasing |...

Jeremiah 36 shows that God is very much interested in making copies if the originals are destroyed. God also did not keep the New Testament writings in the Biblical Hebrew, but He had them written out in the Koine Greek (Which was the world language at that time). This shows God did not remain...

It’s Burgon and not Burgeon. I don’t care of all of what John Burgon. said. Burgon is not some patron saint or person I look up to. Burgon only shows that the Modern Bibles are corrupt. That’s it. As for the KJB being perfect, Burgon is not the man to do that (obviously).

To my knowledge: There are two major KJB bibles that are most widely used today (or the most popular or most influential). It is the Oxford 1769 KJB (with the Apocrypha later removed by publishers in 1885), and the Cambridge Pure King James Edition (circa. 1900). I believe the Cambridge Pure...

Another reason to believe in the King James Bible: It has long been recognised to have poetic form and meter. It has the least number of words per sentence on average, and the least number of syllables per word on average. Understood many years ago by secular scholars to be the highest form...

The words of the Lord have been purified seven times. The pure Cambridge Edition KJB (circa 1900) is the Word of God for today. 1885 is when publishers removed the Apocrypha. 1900 is a time before Textual Criticism took away God’s words out of people’s hands here in America in the 1970’s with...

But you indirectly attacked the KJB by praising James Price’s book who does attack the KJB. Mr. Price tries to point out faults or problems in the KJB. Pointing out flaws in the KJB is an attack upon the KJB. So where is the perfect Word of God that you can hold in your hands right now? The...

The NAS and NKJV are not more accurate than the KJB because most of all your Modern Translations are going off the corrupt Westcott and Hort / Nestle and Aland (Alexandrian) texts influenced by Rome. I have already demonstrated how Modern bibles have corrupt doctrines, make Jesus appear to...

Of course the Textual Critic (Original Onlyist) may potentially ask me: So dear Mr. Highlighter, where was your perfect bible before the Cambridge 1900 edition? Even other King James Inerrantists like yourself will disagree with you and say they had a perfect bible before you (at least...

The problem is why are you choosing the older NKJV? Is there a reason why? Do you believe it is the settled Word of God? Most likely not. The newest NKJV does make changes that favor the Alexandrian texts. Plus, the updates of the ye, etcetera changes meaning in pronoun distinctions. Do...

The NAS is a Catholic favored Bible. Always has been. So if you want to suck up to a Catholic bible, be my guest. The NKJV comes from the KJV and you are shooting down the KJV. You are totally illogical, my friend. Especially when you refer to either the 1970’s NKJV (New Testament version...

Sorry. Psalms 12:6-7 does not say His words would only be preserved in the original languages. It says His words shall be preserved for all generations. This generation does not know Biblical Hebrew and Biblical Greek. The world language of today is English. Just as God spread the NT...

I think it’s time to move on. Your jukst There was a NKJV in the 1970’s that was just the New Testament. Is that the one you were referring to? This was only the New Testament. Or are you referring to the 1982 edition with the Westcott and Hort footnotes? Note: The NKJV creators lied...

I know, it’s unbelievable that you did not explain 2 Thessalonians 2:10. I am not expecting you to believe that verse in what it plainly says. You have to twist or change it in order for it to conform to Calvinism (Which is simply an unbiblical concept).

Are all questions true? Some questions in life can be loaded or based on false assumptions that are not based on the truth. For example: Rick could ask Bob, “So how long have you been beating your wife, Bob?” And yet, Bob is totally innocent in this matter and Rick is just making false...

Psalms 12:6-7 says that the words of the Lord are purified seven times. This is prophetically speaking ahead to the seven MAJOR KJB Editions. The KJB 1900 Pure Cambridge Edition is the current perfect 1600’s English translation. While all previous KJB Editions basically say the same thing...