Search results

They're a Black Supremacist hate group. They say Whites can't be saved because Jesus only died for (Black) Jews. They're very ignorant but very loud. They try to scare people. They lie about God by saying God hates and God won't save and God condemns. In reality God is love.

Thanks. After you've read the conversation I'll hear your criticisms but not before.

Well, it took some work, but he knows he was believing falsehoods now. Read the conversation. You don't know what they believe. They're not "nice" when they're blaspheming God calling Him a "liar" saying Whites can't be saved because Jesus didn't die on the Cross for them. I guess you delight...

Read the conversation. He was saying Whites couldn't be saved. He's a racist--but he'd say "I don't hate you, God hates you--'Esau I hated'." Get informed before jumping in thinking you're saving someone.

Thanks, but I'm sorry to say that you don't know the discussion you're getting yourself into. They are a Black Supremacist hate group which tells Whites they can't be saved because Jesus didn't die for them (only Black Hebrew Israelites) and that they're going to be slaves when Jesus returns...

It's interesting to note that, granting "works of the Law" are different than "works of the flesh", "flesh" is the word used to describe the means whereby the "works of the Law" are done Romans 4:1 Galatians 3:2-3--and since flesh is "sinful" it can never get those works done Romans 8:3, and you...

Actually, I was mistaken, because I got this thread mixed up with my thread about "Eternal Life". lol

You are in God's way when you militate against His Word--eg, "they are no longer His children" Deuteronomy 32:5, "the one who sinned against Me I will blot out of My book" Exodus 32:33, Revelation 3:4-5.

Your fruit is you refuse to handle Scriptures I cited. What is that supposed to tell me?

This is my thread, so I can't "jump into" it. I'm simply asking you guys to deal with the Scriptures cited in the OP. Most of you can't--you're like vampires before sunlight.

It should be pointed out that it appears Romans 2:21-23 could also (along with "do not covet" Romans 3:19-20+Romans 7:7) be read ("work of the Law" Romans 2:14-15) as concluding some other "10 Commandments" moral laws (prohibitions against theft adultery and idolatry) under "works of the Law" as...

Actually, he did : he appends "for by the Law comes the knowledge of sin" to "for by works of Law" thus when he says "I would not have known sin unless the Law had said 'do not covet'" he's saying it's a work of the Law.

I actually didn't alter the passages at all. They just plainly state doctrine.

Clarification : Just wanted to show that Law pertains to the activity of flesh (as also in Galatians 3:1-5 and Romans 4:1-2) but Grace pertains to the activity of God's Spirit. Not saying the Spirit will perform a physical circumcision. LOL

Yeah it seems like one of the great distinctions is not the content of the work itself (for there is much overlap) but rather from whom the work issues--flesh or God. Romans 2:29 "not by the letter but by the Spirit" "circumcision made without hands".

Also the arguments in the reply which this reply of yours is supposed to address were not responded to.

The idea that hearts can't change to hearts of unbelief is unbiblical as we are warned that sin "hardens" which can turn the heart unbelieving Hebrews 3:12-13. The idea children can't "unbecome" children is not biblical either Deuteronomy 32:5.

Oops! He himself said "do no covet" was a work of the Law by which he came to know sin and you have no bases for rejecting that. Not sure what the issue is.

I provided Scripture. 'By works of Law no flesh is justified for by the law comes knowledge of sin... I would not have known what it was to covet except the Law said' do not covet'". I guess words mean nothing to you. That's interesting. lol