Search results

I would encourage you to read Acts of the Apostles 15:1-24 and carefully think about what took place there. Then read Galatians 5:2 and Galatians 5:4 and carefully think about how they may relate. Why? Well, the key to understanding Paul and his claim that we are saved by God's grace through...

Time changes many things in life. For example: A person can be hired at a job by a job application, and job interview and not by any performance of doing the actual work at the job itself. But if the person fails to perform or do the work at the job, in many cases, they most likely will be...

This is the same kind of problem people have when they don’t understand the Trinity. Some people cannot just understand that the Lord our God is one God and yet He also exists as three distinct persons. I have seen it tons of times. There was even a Christian I talked with before who accepts...

If I could like your post again… I would do so, brother. Well said.

The problem is that you make your mindset and experience the standard when in reality that is not how other people see it. This is your flaw. You are not putting yourself in the shoes of others. Take for example if Rick woke up on an island (Knowing nothing about the Trinity), and he did not...

So you have watched the video in it’s entirety? If so, I don’t get that impression. If you did watch the whole thing, were you listening to the points he was making?

That’s not the point. The point is…. What Bible more clearly teaches the Trinity and which Bibles eliminate these truths so as to favor Anti-Trinitarians. Then again… your position is illogical because God told you to favor the NKJV which has 1 John 5:7 in it. So you are only arguing against...

But they are not the standard. The Bible is the standard, and truth is the standard. There are different kinds of TRO’s even. Thus there are different kinds of KJVO’s. One cannot pigeon hole the whole group into one category seeing they favor the King James Bible as a trustworthy and...

No. It does not correct it, …. It merely enhances what the original languages say. They are saying the same thing but… if you know anything about language translations sometimes words can be lost in translation or sometimes words need to be added to convey the same meaning or so as not to...

No. What you see are inferences of a Trinity in a Modern Bible and not any actual direct teaching of the Trinity like 1 John 5:7. That’s the whole point. A person who denies the Trinity is not going to want to look at the KJB verses that defends the Trinity. That’s the whole point. The...

Sure they are valid. I have already listed examples of how they are valid with different scenarios. Your not wanting to accept that does not change the truth of such a thing.

We refuse to accept the Hebrew and Greek if it conflicts with the English because they are supposed to say the same thing because it was translated from those languages into English. People today are simply wanting to correct the Word of God and trying to hide behind the original languages...

I see it more like a preservation of what God said in the originals and so words were added (in italics) in our language to convey the same meaning. Like in all translations…. Some words need to be added for clarity of meaning.

I am not an expert in the life of Dean Burgeon to make that kind of judgment. But he is not a patron saint to me. I simply believe the King James Bible is the Word of God for many reasons. I have come up with 101 reasons actually.

I have already shown the changed doctrine in this thread several times. So no. You are just espousing something that is patiently false, my friend.

Yes it is. If a person wants to reject the Trinity, they will favor a Modern Bible that does not have 1 John 5:7, and the word Godhead (Trinity) that appears three times and changes that word to divinity. If a person only owned a Modern Bible and not a KJB, then they will not know about how...

No. More like clarifies what the originals say with italicized words so that there is no confusion. The italicized words in the KJB are sort of like words in brackets like in the AMP translation. The words in brackets are not really a part of the original text. It’s the same with the...

But that’s illogical because many verses contradict each other and do not all say the same thing. Such a view would simply be a pick and choose your own adventure Bible.

And you assume the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible is not the Bible and you favor the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts, and you favor Westcott, Hort, Nestle, Aland, and the Vatican’s involvement.

Not necessarily. What do you think happened in Jeremiah 36:28-32? When the original was destroyed… a copy was made by Jeremiah AND… something amazing happened. New words were added to the copy. It did not remain exactly like the original. So the idea of originals only is just a sham. God...