Search results

Guilt by association is not always true. It’s actually silly to say that no perfect Bible exists because then a person or scholar can make the Bible say whatever they want it to say (Whenever it disagrees with them). The text keeps changing when new… Non-Textus Receptus manuscripts comes to...

The Modern Bibles have been corrupted by Rome. You can check out page 21 here of the 14 changes in Modern Bibles that favor the Roman Catholic Church. http://www.keithpiper.org/storage/books/NIV-Omissions-Cimatu-7July2018-pdf.pdf

Textual Criticism in itself is in favor of the Roman Catholic church’s way of thinking. It’s not Bible Alone, but it’s placing the scholar upon on a pedestal. Just as the Catholic today says we cannot know the Bible without the priest, so today Textual Criticism says you cannot know the Bible...

No. The Nestle and Aland text does not primarily rely heavily upon the Textus Receptus. If it did, then 1 John 5:7 would be in the Bible among other verses.

There is a huge difference between a commentary and a translation. You have to understand that the King James Bible was not a work that was solely in favor of one kind of belief of a particular church over another. King James wanted a translation that was not like the Geneva Bible or Puritans...

Not if these Lexicons come from the Revisers who attacked the Traditional Text. Not if these textual sources come from Alexandria Egypt that shows a clear line of changed doctrines.

There are two lines of manuscripts. One line of manuscripts comes from Antioch (Which is where Christians are first named). The other lines comes from Alexandria which is the fountain head of gnostics, Arianism, etcetera. Alexandria is in Egypt and Egypt is mentioned as predominantly as being...

Many times I have gone to commentaries in the past, they just seem to be devoid of what the Holy Spirit is saying. We need to pray, and compare Scripture with Scripture more. We need to simply read the context to get the meaning more. Yes, I believe the reading of Christians can be helpful...

Go to any English grammar class and show the comparison of these verses between the KJB vs. Modern bibles and tell the teacher and the students (That are not biased towards the silliness of Modern Scholarship) and they will tell you the different verses convey different meanings. One word...

This would be in the Modern English Translations that come from the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts that is the textual basis for Nestle and Aland New Testament Greek text that favors the Westcott and Hort text (Which has many ties to the Roman Catholic Church). Now, I personally use Modern...

Did Jesus ever pierce His ears? Would Jesus get his ears pierced today? I cannot imagine that happening. Jesus is to be our example and not the world. Also, the Old Testament specifically forbids tattoos and the New Covenant says not to defile the body (which would include potentially harmful...

I believe there seven Major KJB editions that lines up with Psalms 12:6 that says that the words of the Lord are purified seven times. Why would I believe this? Well, there 101 reasons came up with for the existence of a perfect Bible today. The KJB has the marks in being the best candidate...

See post #1097.

I believe there are two sides of the coin of faith. Check out my write up here: The Two Sides of the Coin of Faith

Stay away from tattoos. They are false blood covenants.

Please keep in mind that the TextusReceptus Bibles is TRO and not KJVO. They are “Textus Receptus Only” and they are open to re-translating and or updating the KJB (of which I do not agree with). But the point here is that Textus Receptus Bibles website shows you the changes of which you can...

Here is the list of changes that you can check for yourself by taking the actual Greek from the Textus Receptus and copying and pasting it into Yandex. Differences between the Textus Receptus and the Nestle Aland/United Bible Society Text - Textus Receptus Bibles Then you can take the Greek...

I provided a list of verses from Textus Receptus Bibles that show you the changes. You can look them up yourself at the actual Nestle and Aland online text. For example: The Nestle and Aland 28th Edition does not have 1 John 5:7. You can see that the Greek words are a lot shorter (Which...

You don’t understand that there are two lines of manuscripts. One pure and one corrupt. However, the chart above here that says the Sinaiticus is from 350 AD is false. It’s actually a recent corrupt manuscript or forgery. Take for example: Do you believe the Bible is the Word of...

You mean it contains all of the Alexandrian corrupt manuscripts. It does not include the TR (Textus Receptus). Here are the differences: Differences between the Textus Receptus and the Nestle Aland/United Bible Society Text - Textus Receptus Bibles