Search results

Go back to the Textus Receptus Greek for 2 Thes. ch. 2 KJV. Go look at it YOURSELF, since you are ignoring the fact, that I already did your homework for you! . I don't feel sorry for your helplessness, if you haven't read from that which I referenced from the Textus Receptus Greek. However...

You are only half way there to the truth. You only walked away from one pile of religious baggage, and exchanged it for other religious baggage.

Reposted again: The outline of the 70 weeks: Dan.9[24] Seventy weeks 1. are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, 2. to finish the transgression, and 3. to make an end of sins, and 4. to make reconciliation for iniquity, and 5. to bring in everlasting righteousness, and 6. to seal...

Correction: ...does not impose upon the reader...

I apologize for the misread.:)

I reject all bibles that are translated from the Westcott and Hort Greek text. I strongly support the Textus Receptus Greek text- KJV Since all bibles are translations, it is the Greek text that spells the difference. Of all the bibles out there, the 1611-KJV Bible is the only one that does...

Correction: 1 Maccabees was authored by a Jew in approx. 1st century. Though that which was written in Hebrew is mostly now lost, the Greek version remains somewhat in tact. In any case, that part of Jewish history is well known of by any Jew who is a student of Israeli history.

Thanks for acknowledging that. Maccabees was written by the Jews in Since Israel was centrally involved with the AoD, that Jesus spoke of in Daniel, I strongly disagree that the history of Israel was a small speck. You have not yet learned who "the holy people" were- Dan. 8:24 or who "the host...

Again! ALL of the above, concerning what the ECFs believed about prophetic events, are as outdated as the Prophecies of Ellen G. White, or any other church pronouncement. Tme is always moving us forward, and to sit in what was said yester-century, is to SIT IN concrete. Prophecy is progressive...

How emotionally charged you are, about those YOU think have "sympathies" for the RCC, has no bearing on me! I presented grammatical facts, and already you are speaking by inuendos of name calling. I do not hope, for your sake, that you achieve better success "elsewhere", knocking down factual...

Reposted: The outline of the 70 weeks: Dan.9[24] Seventy weeks 1. are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, 2. to finish the transgression, and 3. to make an end of sins, and 4. to make reconciliation for iniquity, and 5. to bring in everlasting righteousness, and 6. to seal up the...

Uh, yes I DID! You just can't escape or let go of your indoctrination. Thank you for the discussion also.

I fully explained and proved the reasoning of that error. If you can't accept it, then know that you will be battling with your own indoctrination. As I did say, Please go and read it

Maccabees is HISTORY! Ask any Jew!

The word "one" is an insertion in the TR Greek. Saying "the lawless" is factually in the plural. Saying "the lawless [one]" is assumed in the singular.

Wrong choice of words. Antichrist as you understand the term, is not written in 2 Thes. 2

Absolutely yes! I (Earburner) don't need to appeal to anything but the Bible (KJV) and accurate history (and Maccabees, written BY the Jews, confirmed by their feast of Hanukkah) to prove my eschatology.

How many are there, in the words "the natural man"? One, or billions?

You wrote: Dude, if you choose to continue believing Jesuit lies after you've been shown the truth about where Futurism and Preterism came from and why they were sent into the world, then I can't help you. I'll pray for you :) . >Hi Phoneman, I replied to your post, of which I took it that you...

The outline of the 70 weeks: Dan.9[24] Seventy weeks 1. are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, 2. to finish the transgression, and 3. to make an end of sins, and 4. to make reconciliation for iniquity, and 5. to bring in everlasting righteousness, and 6. to seal up the...