Search results

I wasn't aware of anything by that "religious" term. Since 35 years ago, along with an 8 translation NT, I threw it out, and all their "religious" terms, that would solidify my mind, by their preconceived, religionist concrete. Therefore, by His Holy Spirit, and the KJV, I live by the counsel...

:)

All I hope for in others, is for them to look into His Truth, and be willing to let go of of their false doctrines of "church-ianity" , and stand with the Lord alone! Apparently you and many others here are afraid of being "unliked" and unpopular. Jesus does understand the issue of being unpopular!

1. Only duped Christians think what you are saying, and unfortunately, MOST ARE duped! . 2. Learn your Daniel, "horns" are NEVER beasts! . 3. No, the 4th beast was a composite of the three beasts before it, of which was in full tilt in the days of Jesus' first appearance. . 4. You are implying...

Correct. They all, who are "none of His", are "the natural man", "condemned already", aka "the wicked", being each one "ungodly", "that man of sin", the son of perdition", "because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." Rom. 8:9 1 Cor. 2:14 John 3:18 Mat. 13:49 jude...

Thank you for your reply. Have you considered the following fact? Everyone who is NOT "born again" of God's Holy Spirit, they have not the Righteousness of Christ, and therefore by default, they remain to be lawless, because they are "none of His"- Rom. 8:9

Sorry, I cannot see post numbers on a mobile device. . According to the angel Gabriel's interpretation, there are only two facts, concerning "a little horn" . Fact #1: Antiochus Epiphanes, of the 3rd beast, was the one and only "little horn" ever to be! Fact #2: There is no "little horn" that...

Mat. 13[49] So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just,

Question: what temple does the Lord desire to dwell in? Ans. 1Cor. 3:16 . What visible example did Jesus provide, of what the temple is? Ans. John 2:21 . If God is not Living/Dwelling within us, who is? Ans. 1Cor. 2:14 . What is the association that God/Jesus have, with those described in 1 Cor...

According to the Textus Receptus Greek,..... IT IS A GROUP of people, and one of a very large size,... as in MANY!! Do associate that with Rom. 8:9 Rom.8[9] But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of...

Yes!! That was clearly THEIR intention! Make SURE that it's read in the singular, and not the plural. Yes they did "pin the tail on the donkey", but I have found out that WE are the donkey. By the way I am a staunch Methodist, and NOT Catholic.

Your welcome! BTW, I study the KJV only. I already gave my testimony of why, here on this thread. I also do understand why the KJV translators were persuaded to write 2 Thes. 2:8 in the manner they did. 1611 was not far from the Protestant Reformation. Ahh...now we can see the bigger picture of...

SG wrote: However, the context is referring to the lawless [one]. So, it seems that whether ‘that’ or ‘the’ doesnt do damage to the meaning of the passage. > Well, you be the judge, by dropping the inserted word [one] And use the correct pronoun of "the", and then make the comparison yourself...

The INSERTED word "that", was purposely done, so that the reader would understand that the words are to be read in the singular. However, in the Textus Receptus Greek, no such error, insertion or implication exists for the word "that". Instead, the word "the" is used, and by that single correct...

The CORRECT Greek word for "that" IS "the" . The Greek word "wicked" has the word "one" under it in brackets- [ ]. Any word that is in brackets is an insertion. Therefore, when correctly read, as the Textus Receptus Greek reveals, those words "that Wicked", as found in the KJV are erroneous...

Even the word "one" is in brackets [one], which is showing that it is also an insertion.

2 Thessalonians 2:8 Greek Text Analysis

I realize that most people can't/won't accept that 2 Thes. 2:8 is an insertion by the translators. I provided the means whereby one can search it for themselves. It's not "that Wicked" , but rather "the wicked" in the Textus Receptus Greek (KJV). See my prev. Posts on that. There no longer any...

bbyrd009 wrote: "...After his death his empire too destabilized and formed four lesser successors that continued to battle each other." > I am assuming that you are referring to Alex The Great. Correct?