Search results

There is no other rapture.

The belief of misled Pretribbers. This is wrong and unbiblical. No one can prove that.

Ok. So, when Jesus comes that is it? It is over. We are now into eternity?

You have no answer to the truth, that is why you have all run and hid. You have to. Pretrib is dead. It was given a decent burial here 12 months ago. You all run when cornered with the fact you do not have 1 proof text.

Same thing. You guys are all over the place. You cannot agree among yourselves. One is refuting the foolish arguments of the other. That is because you are all wrong.

You are incapable of engaging on one text. You have no proof-text. When that is shown you move to another, and another. You have nothing. Present a text and support it with 1 more text proves your case, and corroborate it.

You Pretribs cannot even agree. LOL. You are both wrong. You have been misled. That is why you avoid every rebuttal. Checkmate!

Do you believe in more than one future coming of Christ?

I see the Pretribs cannot answer one single Posttrib question or rebut one argument. They are definitely on the ropes. Pretrib is dead in the water. I predicted their downfall over a year ago.

Grace? Nonsense. The elect have always experienced salvation by way of God's grace (it is therefore unmerited). Gen 6:8 states: "Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD." No wonder you avoid the biblical rebuttals. You are espousing a false gospel.

He does not want to know. He is indoctrinated with the lie of Pretrib.

You have no answer to the truth. That is why you keep ducking around every single question and every single biblical argument. You have to in order to sustain your error. Revelation 19:11-21 outlines: “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called...

More avoidance. Please support your claims by Scripture.

You totally avoided the biblical evidence that forbids your claims. Please address.

Futurists can call “the beast” (Revelation 17:8, 11) “antichrist” (1 John 4:3) and “the mystery of iniquity” (2 Thessalonians 2:7), “that man of sin” (2 Thessalonians 2:3), “the son of perdition” (2 Thessalonians 2:3) and “that Wicked” (2 Thessalonians 2:8) a literal physical “man” all they...

Very true!

I couldn't care less whether you change your view or not. I'm simply presenting the contradictions of Premillennialism. As you can see above by the avoidance, there is no rebuttal forthcoming. If you want to reject the truth that is on you. I am free. I have blown the trumpet.

When Premils are cornered they resort to 2 chapter (neither of which correlate) Zech 14 and Rev 20.

Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described sin existing on a future millennial earth? Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the cross that described corruption existing on a future millennial earth? Please quote any ECF in the first 210 years after the...

When you study Armageddon in Revelation, it does not portray a battle. The wicked simply gather for battle, whereupon God pours out His final wrath.