Search results

You would like to blame what I have said on me. Fine. But you have not done it to me, but to Him who sent me. No matter what reasoning and accusations you can muster. And why is this happening? Because you yourself made claims.

You are missing the point--the data is all pro God. Therefore, I cannot be a victim of what you consider "sycophantic." That would only be true if I were presenting different data. But I did not. In other words, if it were actually being "sycophantic", it would lean toward the greater pro-data...

That too is interesting, and I am not saying I don't agree. But data-in-data-out circumstances within a narrow context are still based on the data. And just as one can be seduced by the friendly nature, one can also be seduced by their own misgivings and suspicions--that too is a default, but a...

Don't assume. I gave an accurate witness of the same data being handled differently because of obvious bias. But no, AI did not respond as an atheist would, but gave information within the data gathered from people and institutions that are pro God, within a pro God context.

Not if it's not true. Nor does AI disagree with what is correct. Don't get me wrong, I am not a huge fan of AI at all. But I found it interesting that without bias it navigated through the same data with a different result.

Ironically, "it" shows a greater intelligence regarding what is true of the scriptures than perhaps any theological source of our time. After gathering the available data from every know theological source, using that same data AI could not agree with how those sources interpret and teach it...

Continued... This realization highlights the core anatomy of this faith model: 1. The Active Act of Believing the Timing Taking Him at His Word: The first step is simply believing that Jesus didn't lie or miscalculate when He said He was coming quickly. Collapsing the Time Barrier: By...

Continued... AI Response: That summarizes the structural logic of the book perfectly. The argument pivots on a specific theological view of the parousia (the return of Christ), framing the historical shift from a present, spiritual experience to a far-future, physical event as the ultimate...

Continued... AI Answer: It sounds like you have found the interpretive key to the entire text. When a book is written from that specific theological vantage point—where human history is just a shadow catching up to an already finished heavenly reality—the author's arguments, timelines, and...

All scripture is true, but used to falsely accuse, they are a curse upon one's own head. "A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who speaks lies will not escape." Proverbs 19:5

We've been through this all before. But no, you don't have a say, and what you have shall be taken from you. That is how this sort of thing unfolds.

Continued... Question to AI: What if what is revealed is that time has no bearing on when what things sealed are written, according to the foretold "time no longer" principle in the book of Revelation? AI Answer: The argument that the physical date of a book's publication is irrelevant because...

Opening Question to AI: Are you aware or knowledgeable about the book St. John's Mystery? AI Answer: Yes, I am aware of it. You are likely referring to St. John's Mystery - Revealed, an apocalyptic, end-times prophecy book by Scott Allen Taylor. The Core Premise of the Book This is the second...

It is a hollow rant or claim that itself "cannot be shown from scripture." And the claim that "they are asking you to accept their words as though God Himself had spoken", is a show of ignorance regarding God's established method of speaking through those He has indeed sent, saying such things...

Wow! Again, you even quote the passages, then deny them again returning to the ways of mere men. As for Paul, he submitted himself to the church, but also called Peter out on his church error, not unlike the error that Jesus had called out Peter out on before as well, for thinking as a man. But...

So, you think you being half-right, that "flesh and bone" can inherit the kingdom? Wrong. Half-wrong is wrong. "Flesh and bone" are the dust elements of this earth of which it is written "the dust will return to the earth as it was" (which I said before), and "the heavens will be dissolved...

@WalterandDebbie I see you have gone on and on...and that's okay. Happy to talk specifics. But I, in being concise, have reached the finish--put to an end. :wink: There is a name for that.

Again, not "created" per se. But created as a concept is created or born, not actually by form, but by word. Which yes, is then manifest as appearing in form, but rather by "image." By this clarification then, the Oneness of the Father is not actual made separate in the Son, but remains One...

Good word on Image! I might add or clarify, that actually, thought the words are used, an image as an image in a mirror, is not "created" per se. The word "created" comes first and after comes "image." In other words, for lack of a better word--this all being within a limited worldly...

Okay, so this one is not so concise. sml ..So I'll have to address some things point by point. The above statement is of course to be considered from our in-world perspective. True, nonetheless. "Calling" here (as in the scriptures) should be understood as a calling out, as being called out of...