Search results

Since I have now made my point, I will let off here, so that you may hopefully continue your thread in whatever direction you were planning to go with it.

What were "their" pronouns at that time? I, I, and I? or We? Do you see how that, logically, I am forced to use "their" in my question? Should I have rather asked, What were "His" pronouns at the time? I, I, and I? or We? And the OP claims he is here to explain it and to finish it? (this...

No, none of that is what I think or believe: it's about consistency, for when the scripture sets a precedent that precedent is generally maintained throughout. Moreover there was a perfect opportunity for the Meshiah to make the question about Trinitarianism clear as day when he said "I and my...

I think not, rather, if people want to teach that Elohim saying "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness" means that the Creator is a Trinity or Twinity, then it needs to be the same always, or Elohim has changed, which He says He does not do. Therefore, for anyone else to come along...

Hmmm, then I have no clue why you asked the question when you yourself have not "noticed something peculiar," or "anything controversial, about what Paul writes in this passage", or if you were not suggesting that some others might, even though you do not. :confused

Well said, well done! WINNER!

I'm going to guess, (especially in light of the teachings of modern MS Christianity), that what may be controversial in this day and age would be the fact that Paul does not appear to consider any of them to be already totally "saved", which must be so, for he is essentially declaring to them...

JM is right: it is a disputed passage, just as are quite a few of the Trinitarian "proof texts". 1 Timothy 3:16 ASV 16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness; He who was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the spirit, Seen of angels, Preached among the nations, Believed on...

This one is close but the problem with the majority of translations is that they are misreading מאת, (which in this case should quite obviously be read as "from Himself" and is explanatory). בראשית 19:24 Hebrew OT: WLC (Consonants Only) ויהוה המטיר על־סדם ועל־עמרה גפרית ואש מאת יהוה מן־השמים׃...

I have already discovered by this poll that there are many haters claiming to be Christians on this board, full of vitriol and judgement, and most of them are not even actually Trinitarians: so I have no doubt there would also be plenty of "two YHWH", "three YHWH", and maybe even "four YHWH"...

All this without a shred of evidence, O prophet? Repent, and ask forgiveness for totally ignoring the commandments of the Master which you have wantonly violated and which are clearly written in his Testimony in the Gospel accounts. You act and speak as if you have known me for years and yet...

Hebrew manuscript of the Apocalypse found in Cochin, India, (at the very least, several hundred years old). Hebrew Apocalypse 17:3-4 3 And he brought me into the wilderness, and I beheld the woman sitting upon the beast, whose appearance was like the appearance of lilies, [originally shoshani...

Have you ever seen a literal city made of flesh? (I hope not). Revelation 17:15-18 ASV 15 And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the harlot sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues. 16 And the ten horns which thou sawest, and the beast, these shall hate...

Keturah produces unto Abraham hnh magoi mqedem, "those of the nations from the east", (see the erroneous reading producing Magoi/Magi into the Greek version of Matthew 2, and we have also the confirmation of the truth by the mouth of Yeshayah the Prophet in Isa 60:6). Genesis 25:5-6 KJV 5 And...

The kingdom of Elohim does not come with ocular-visual observation: neither shall they say, Behold, here it is! nor, Look, over there! for behold, the kingdom of Elohim is within you. — Partial Quote: Luke 17-20-21.

https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/john-17-the-name.72915/ The Seven I am Statements: https://www.christianityboard.com/threads/logos-logic.71020/#post-2104766 One word: AGENCY. This may be a one-liner for you but would take me a whole separate thread to explain it.

How about you providing some actual justification for some of the more obviously, wildly, ultra-biased Trinitarian translations you posted to support what you believe. New Living Translation That is why I said that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that I Am who I claim to be...

No, I didn't swap anything: John 4:26 is the same on all accounts. Scroll down just below the first section in the following link: https://biblehub.com/text/john/4-26.htm

Do you understand why he is in italics? (I already explained it). As for the first quote I do not see why it is even in italics because the phrase ego eimi has the article following. John 4:26 26 λεγει αυτη ο ιησους εγω ειμι ο λαλων σοι εγω ειμι ο λαλων σοι ~ I am he [the one] speaking with you...

The Meshiah does not point the hearer, (or reader), to Exodus 3:14. He very clearly points the hearers in the passage back to what he said to them at the commencement of their conversation, which commencement is John 8:12. 24 I said therefore unto you, that you shall die in your sins: for if...