Search results

What I see is you ignoring plain, bold, emphatic statements from the Savior so that you can maintain something else you believe from Jn 1:1 and Jn 1:14. That's the non sequitur.

Excellent. This is what I had planned on bringing up next but you beat me to it. John 12:47-50 is confirming and expounding Deuteronomy 18:17-19.

So then, those who are believing on/into the (Testimony) of the Meshiah are passing from death into the Life, though they/we are denying ourselves, taking up our own stakes to be crucified with him in the supernal way, and following him. Thank the Goodness and Grace of Elohim that the Testimony...

This is my little Creed from the Gospel of Yohannei, (a.k.a. John), and following below the Creed, concerning what the following bold, plain, emphatic statements from the Meshiah compel me to logically conclude by simply believing every word. John 5:22 22 for the Father judges no one, but has...

To whomever may actually be interested: just on the previous page alone the poster above told this many lies about what I believe and have told him multiple times that I believe. I have never made the above accusation-statement anywhere in all of this forum. I have never said that Christ...

Thank you. Great, (no worries it was not a trick question), so that supports the point I was making: the one in the parable is pretty obviously the Meshiah himself, that is, the Christos or Anointed One. And he it is who was and is a man, the Chosen One, and he was not preexisting or existing...

Statement "a)" is the only fully true statement you've made. The rest are not true because, for one, they do not exist in the scripture, and for two, you are already shown to be ignoring and therefore distorting the true definition and meaning of pros in John 1:1 so as to uphold an RCC dogma you...

Typical: you must ignore the truth because "the Trinitarian theology is the only one that makes sense"....), but more bad news, regarding the second half of your statement that I just quoted: every other Trinitarian argument stems from either twisting the meaning of a verse or passage and-or is...

So then, you understand that "with" is not "within"? The rendering "with" regarding the definitions of pros, surely describes two Gods, not one. It is one God either directly in front of another God, as though face to face, or at the very least one God directly beside another God. This is not...

Since you have mentioned earlier that you are able to read the scripture in Greek, (that was you, correct? forgive me if I am wrong), please explain the meaning of pros.

Revelation 2:17 17 ο εχων ους ακουσατω τι το πνευμα λεγει ταις εκκλησιαις τω νικωντι δωσω αυτω του μαννα του κεκρυμμενου και δωσω αυτω ψηφον λευκην και επι την ψηφον ονομα καινον γεγραμμενον ο ουδεις οιδεν ει μη ο λαμβανων _______. Revelation 19:12 12 οι δε οφθαλμοι αυτου φλοξ πυρος και επι...

Were Canaanite kings anointed at their coronations? Back to inheritance: regarding the decree quoted in Acts 13:33 and what I said about it, (which you at least said that it was a possibility). Acts 13:32-34 32 And we bring you good tidings of the promise made unto the fathers, 33 that Elohim...

I see now that what you are doing here is probably the best tactic you have: just keep repeating the same nonsense and assuming or outright making a plethora of false insinuations-accusations until everyone who disagrees with you gives up and walks away. If you actually think I am still reading...

The scripture does that already and it has been shown to you from two Psalms.

That's why I keep trying to explain to you that the Logos is the one-of-a-kind Son. When are you going to actually read and understand what I am writing? Of course, because the Logos is Elohim, the Word of the Father: so the Father raised up the Meshiah because the Spirit of the Father, His...

I also note you keep spewing lies and am now getting bored with it again.

As previously stated: no, I don't. Again, the decree of Psalm 2:7 was spoken to the Meshiah, a man, born of a woman, of the seed of David according to the flesh. I believe the scripture, all of it: what I do not believe are your fantasy doctrines such as that the Father thought it was too...

John 1:1-5, Hebrews 7:1-3, for starters. The Meshiah, a man, and the Spirit that was in him raised him from the dead, Rom 8:11. Lol. They are not my articles: that's simply the Greek text of the Apostolic writings. And where have I said that? Quote the post or please stop lying. It...

Nope, I did not claim what you say I claimed: my claim was that the Psa 2:7 decree was spoken to the Meshiah in the Matthew and Luke Gospel accounts. That is unacceptable for you because you desperately need Rom 1:4 to confirm your theory about the Psa 2:7 decree having been spoken to the...