Search results

I call "BS" on this post because I have provided you with Biblical arguments for EVERY one of these point.s YOU responded with your usual game of denial and never provided a Biblical refutation . . . Why don't you try to actually prove them wrong?

And again – I be to differ . . . Circumcision involved the cutting of flesh – by human hands. Baptism doesn’t require cutting by human hands - or even touching for that matter. The work is done by the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38). Col. 2:11-12 is absolutely about Baptism . . .

Let me know when you want to have an intelligent discussion about the topic. Don't have time for silly games . . .

After reading this repeatedly – I’m NOT quire sure what your point is. You mention the fact that Jesus was circumcised and that He was Baptized. WHAT does that have to do with Infant Baptism??

I beg to differ. Here, Paul is talking about the SAME thing . . . Col. 2:11-12 In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, having been buried with him in BAPTISM, in which...

Don‘t understand what you’re saying here . . . So what’s your point?? As I stated before – the Baptism of John and the Baptism into Christ is NOT the same thing. Jesus was not being born again when He was Baptized by John. Yes, you “agree” with the Scriptures - but you can’t seem to tell me...

Soooo you agree that Baptism is the circumcision of the heart? You made NO argument, so I guess you agree with me . . .

Circumcision was the cutting off of foreskin. Baptism is immersion into water. To what “human hands” are you referring?

As I have repeatedly stated - this entire argument is moot, given its precursor, which was circumcision. - Circumcision was the entrance into the Covenant with God. - Baptism is the entrance into the New Covenant with God. It is the true “circumcision of the heart”, as Paul calls it...

Like I said over a DOZEN times now. Infant/Child Baptism is an implicit teaching of Scripture. It’s not explicitly mentioned. In the SAME way – the doctrine of the Trinity, which is the most basic and fundamental belief of Christianity is also only implicitly taught. NOWHERE does the Bible...

Forgetting the fact that AI searches is very left-leaning and anti-Christian overall – you STILL need to show me where the Bible claims that the Bible is our ONLY Authority (Sola Scriptura). NONE of you has been able to do this . . .

Not ONLY did I give you the Biblical references to THREE households being baptized – I also gave the testimonies of the Early Church Fathers who carried this Apostolic Tradition into the early centuries of the Church’s existence – SOME of whom were just a few generations away. Now, since YOU...

Ummm, YOU are the one who said that “entire households” didn’t necessarily indicate children of ALL ages. I simply asked you to provide a SINGE Biblical example of a household that didn’t include children of all ages.. If you can’t do that, just admit it - but don’t give me this nonsense about...

It’s essentially the same question in both verses.. Soooo, that’s your response - denial?? Good job . . . Ummm, YOU called it “necromancy”. It may be a practice you disagree with – but I just proved to you that it’s NOT necromancy. And there is NOTHING in the Bible that supports YOUT false...

They are BOTH required of ALL seeking rebirth in Christ. In BOTH cases, the parents speak for the child. So, YOU are saying that they cannot enter into a Covenant with God. WHY, then were Jewish babies allowed to enter a Covenant with God? First of all - John’s Baptism was NOT the same a...

They didn’t. As I have shown, this is an implicit teaching – not an explicit one. Like other implicit teachings like the Trinity – Mary’s importance was NOT overlooked in the NT: 1 OT - On the Day of the Dedication of the Temple which Solomon built, there were 120 priests present (2 Chron...

Here is another Type and Fulfillment that you cannot claim is just "coincidence" OT - On the Day of the Dedication of the Temple which Solomon built, there were 120 priests present (2 Chron. 5:11). The Ark of the covenant was carried into the Temple (2 Chron. 5:7) and fire came down from Heaven...

This is NOT used in the same context. In Acts 3:25 - Peter is speaking to adults – about themselves. In Acts 2:39 – Peter is speaking to adults about their children. The entire argument that a child MUST grow up and declare his faith before being Baptized is ludicrous when compared to...

I have better than that. I have a direct quote that is almost verbatim to the OT type: OT - "Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?" (2 Sam. 6:9) NT - "Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" (Luke 1:43) NT fulfillments don’t require direct comparisons. Where is...

WRONG, son. The Catholic Church REJECTS Replacement Theology. In the document, Nostra Aetate, the Church’s declaration on non-Christian religions - this theology is NOT supported but condemned. If you had bothered to look up the Church’s official position instead of making up your own fairy...