Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    A simple question. But unsurprisingly still too difficult for you to answer. :laughing:
  2. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Since you don't understand it, just leave it for those who do.
  3. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Are you gnostic? Because your explanation is gnostic. The hyperspiritualization of literal truth. If the temple represented not a literal edifice but rather the saints in Matthew 24, then the temple represents the saints wherever it is referenced. So you believe: Matthew 21:12 And Jesus went...
  4. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Here are the 144,000. The Church of the Redeemed through all ages from beginning to end. Immeasurably Grand and Glorious. The Church and the 144,000 Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in the NT for believers in Christ – His Body and Bride – His...
  5. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    I pray for those in Israel who are in Christ, or who are seeking. I do not pray for antichrists in Israel or anywhere else, who have chosen to deny Christ. 1 John 2:18;2:22;4:3 2 John 1:7
  6. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Sure. Matthew 24 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) 16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Luke 21 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with...
  7. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    What do you think triggered their flight? Just for the fun of it? :laughing:
  8. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The historical account of the Judaean Christians' flight is given by Eusebius of Caesarea, acclaimed Father of Church History: The people of the Church in Jerusalem were commanded by an oracle given by revelation before the war to those in the city who were worthy of it to depart and dwell in...
  9. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The historical account of the Judaean Christians' flight is given by Eusebius of Caesarea, acclaimed Father of Church History: The people of the Church in Jerusalem were commanded by an oracle given by revelation before the war to those in the city who were worthy of it to depart and dwell in...
  10. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    Answer my question first, then I'll answer yours.
  11. C

    SETTLING THE FALSE THEORY OF REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY

    They're antitalmudic, not antisemitic. Do you know the difference?
  12. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Josephus is a recognized historian. You're not. :laughing: Do you think you know more about Jewish history than Jews know about Jewish history? You don't. :laughing: You got your info from your imagination.
  13. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    To the Judaean Christians just prior to 70 AD, it referred to the Roman armies advancing on the holy city Jerusalem. They recognized the sign, and fled, and saved their lives.
  14. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    "So, you're going to believe something from an organization whose purpose is to denounce anything that could possibly lead to Christ?" What a ludicrous statement. When Titus gave credit to God for the Roman victory, did he "denounce anything that could possibly lead to Christ"? "We have...
  15. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    True. Messiah the Prince was the prince to come. He came between five and six centuries after Daniel wrote. Hogwash. :laughing: Here is a description of 70 AD from the Jewish Virtual Library itself. Ancient Jewish History: The Great Revolt No conscripts to be seen. Only Roman troops and...
  16. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils) Bk 2, chap. 17 “The pope is of so...
  17. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    The Roman commander Titus was considerably smarter than you. :laughing: "We have certainly had God for our assistant in this war, and it was no other than God who ejected the Jews out of these fortifications; for what could the hands of men or any machines do towards overthrowing these...
  18. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Messiah the Prince is undeniably the most important part. If you understood antecedents/referents, you would agree. But you don't. Where in the passage does the word "antichrist" occur? The people of Messiah the Price are of secondary importance. They were the Romans and Jews, both of whom...