Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Amen bro.
  2. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    So true, bro. They need to contort and mutilate the obvious in an attempt to shoehorn it into their dispen paradigm. Nonsense upon nonsense it certainly is.
  3. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    There is no difference. "Judaea" is the same "Judaea" in all three accounts. The flight is the same in all three accounts. The AoD was the armies surrounding Jerusalem, the sign to flee. That is accurately handling the Word of Truth, not dispensatanally contorting and mutilating it. You...
  4. C

    The Relationship Between Israel and the Church

    Do you think Messiah the Prince is cute?
  5. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Judaea in Matthew 24:16 = Judaea in Mark 13:14 = Judaea in Luke 21:20 They obeyed every one of them. Your claim is invalid. "He" in Daniel 9:27 is Messiah the Prince, who is clearly not in Daniel 11:22-23. Your claim is invalid. I asked if you understand grammar. You didn't respond. Who is...
  6. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    You've been shown that the antecedents/referents of "he" in verse 27 grammatically resolve back to Messiah the Prince in verse 25. Making Him The Covenant Confirmer. Do you understand grammar?
  7. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    They understood that it meant to flee, which is exactly what they did. If they'd been dispensational futurists, they'd have remained in Jerusalem and perished. But they were waaaaaay smarter than you. :laughing: Thank God for the preservation of the Judaean Christian Church.
  8. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    So Jesus never answered any of His disciples' questions. And when He spoke to "you" and "ye", He was speaking to the wind. :laughing: The Judaean Christians invalidate your claim. Prior to 70 AD, they remembered Jesus' warnings, and heeded them, and fled to safety. Matthew 24:15-18; Luke...
  9. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Revelation 11:1-2 for those subscribing to early authorship.
  10. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    70 AD fulfilled Matthew 23:35-39, Matthew 24:1-28, Mark 13:1-23, Luke 21:5-24. Somewhat more than three. :laughing:
  11. C

    The Relationship Between Israel and the Church

    What do you think "about me" means?
  12. C

    The false doctrines of the Preterist and Futurist interpretation

    So Joel Richardson doesn't agree with you, and you haven't cited anyone else who does. This Scripture was written for you. 2 Peter 1 20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
  13. C

    The Relationship Between Israel and the Church

    So true, bro. This identifies what makes the current conflicts in the Middle East so abominable. Israel has deceived "Christian" zionism into fighting its old covenant wars for it. We hear BN refer to Palestinians as amalekites. Zionism is a racist antichrist, and "Christian" zionism is...
  14. C

    The false doctrines of the Preterist and Futurist interpretation

    I said "past or present".
  15. C

    The false doctrines of the Preterist and Futurist interpretation

    What recognized Bible teachers, past or present, agree with your interpretations?
  16. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    So you deny that there has been witness and testimony of more than 1,700 years of the saints of the true Church of God. Nothing to do with Daniel 12:4.
  17. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Daniel declares that 70 weeks are cut off, which history has confirmed, and which precludes the dispensationalized decapitation of the 70th week. The application of Jewish interpretation, which is interpretation by an antichrist, to prophecy about Christ; is a blasphemous abomination of...
  18. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    "Cut off" is not my opinion. That's your denial. But there's no denying the Holy Spirit's inspiration of Daniel's declaration. And no denying the witness and testimony of more than 1,700 years of the saints of the true Church of God.
  19. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    There's nothing more linear than 70 determined fulfilled weeks. You must be amazed with yourself, since you can't see and understand this. :laughing:
  20. C

    This is the context of how Dan. 9:24-27 should be considered!

    Link to any post in which I've said that "the Book of Daniel is "all about" Christ". Then go visit your optometrist. Don't collide with anything on the way. :laughing: Then tell us how to "rightly divide the word of truth".
Top Bottom