Search results

It should be remembered that the Bible is a reference to the various modern language translations. We ought to be talking about the Original NT manuscripts, the Autographa. For example, in GJohn 3:16 the KJV has "the only begotten son." This is found in the English translations but not in the...

Saul's personal experience was not at all typical. God appeared to Saul of Tarsus that took place during the Apostolic Age. Sign gifts will resume in the Tribulation, but not in the Church Age. And the cessation of sign gifts is given in many verses, but the most notable is Heb 2:3, 4. This...

An experience is not something that is either True or False. But you still have to give the argument that provides support for your secular conclusions (ie, Personal Experience). How long is that video?

You wrote, "I guess that my position is The Argument from Personal Experience." Your position for what? I owe you an apology for not listening to your video. I only listen to videos where I know how long the video will take and the bio of the author. I am not very techie

If your argument is based on religious activity, you will need to explain why your religious experience is more probably than a Muslim's religious experience. Religious experience is basically a dogmatic argument since it is not open to refutation nor can it be falsified. Also, we all have...

The point i made was there is no way to tell which, if any, the passages the holy Spirit references. Passages that are at the opposite end of the spectrum are equally just as possible as any other passage. No, we do not agree, the holy Spirit did not create or order the stars. The was the work...

Regarding your use of "statement of intent." Could you give me 3 Koine Greek examples in the New Testament? I haven't found an English translation using that translation. I am just making sure you are not inventing some grammatical construct that is not found anywhere else. The word 'bad' is...

Stop sinning?? What are you getting at? I don't see how that has anything to do with our discussion. I don't see a connection between your comments after "If your answer is no."

You said: Jesus did not remove all sin from the world, but His actions on the Cross will cover the repent humble sinner when they repent of their sins. I vehemently disagree with your comment. I thought something sounded strange when you suggested we believed the same thing. I have disagreed...

Jesus paid for all sins, even the unbeliever's. Sins are not imputed to the one committing them. see 2 Cor 5.17-19, and see 2 Pt 2.1 to see that all sins have been paid for. Christ's payment for sins is not something that is contingent. They were actually paid for. The only thing an unbeliever...

Absolutely not! Having one's sins paid for, has no bearing on salvation. we are not eternally condemned because of sins. The consequences of sin are always temporary. This teaching is Bible 101. You could have answered your own question had you read the verses I quoted in my last post. How could...

2 Cor 5.19 that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people’s sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. All sins were imputed to Christ, who paid for the sins, all of them. All the sins of all time have been paid for, there is...

The unbelievers have been bought also. Does your theology allow for this?

I have demonstrated elsewhere that these passages are in the context of the Jews rejecting their Messiah. The blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is committed only by the nation of Israel in their rejection of Christ. The blasphemy of the Holy Spirit can not be committed in the Church Age.

No, the big dipper reflects the verse "God is love" and "he works all things together for the good." This is what the Holy Spirit revealed to me. Since yours is different, how are we going to determine which passages the big dipper represent.

This is what I mean, it is total subjectivity. Tell me what the Big Dipper means.

Textual Criticism does not involve itself with the stars. Textual Criticism deals with objectivity, not the subjective.

I worked in Textual Criticism when I worked for Dr. Dan Wallace of Dallas Seminary. I traveled with him to England and then I went on ahead in Athens. I was in Athens to find new manuscripts and found some in the Benaki Museum.

"I" never said you stole my pencil! I NEVER said you stole my pencil! I never SAID you stole my pencil! I never said YOU stole my pencil! I never said you STOLE my pencil! I never said you stole MY pencil! I never said you stole my PENCIL!