Search results

And what about Matthew 24:18? Matthew 24:18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. Have you ever checked with the parable of the sower? Do you realize that according to God, the field is the world? And what does clothes have to do with anything? And what is he...

And Doug...or anyone that matter. Pay attention. What housetops? Is it my barn? Is it a building in the Middle East? Any house that we might live in? The ONLY way to really know what it's talking about is to allow scripture to interpret scripture. As complicated as you might think it is, it...

You have been here for a long time and you have seen my posts explaining what Judaea and the mountains signifies in Matthew 24:15-21 for many times, yet are your ears spiritually deaf? You need to THINK carefully. What Judaea, and what Mountains? Should we stick to the isolated wording...

:rolleyes:

You clearly don't understand. The Lord is talking about the parable of the fig tree....and all other trees. Not the parable of the generation. Well, actually, which Jersualem, really? Is it physical city Jerusalem, of the church which is spiritual Jerusalem on this side of the Cross? Aren't...

No, you have not quoted a single passage of Scripture to support the gibberish you are promoting. Your arguments are pure nonsense. Frankly, it is obvious that you do not know what you are talking about—something that seems to be confirmed by the reviews of the books you are selling on Amazon...

Ahem… like I said, you misunderstood. Let’s try this again—carefully this time. Gospel of Matthew chapter 22 is speaking about the fall of the Old Testament congregation, exactly as I already explained. And if there were any doubt, Gospel of Matthew 21:43 confirms it plainly: “The kingdom of...

Say...are these pictures really your biblical answer to the questions: “Are you saying Peter is the son of the devil? If so, exactly who is the devil?” Because posting images is not a substitute for answering directly from Scripture.

Are you saying that Peter is the son of the devil (before he was born again with the Spirit of God)? If so, exactly who is the devil?

Interesting criticism coming from someone who does not even quote God’s Word, while my statements are grounded in Scripture which you did not even biblically refuted. Ultimately, the Lord will judge who faithfully testifies to His Word, and I am fully comfortable leaving that judgment to Him.

Like RWB said, "What are you talking about here?!" You do not make any sense and I can see why you did not quote Scripture to back your nonsenses up. Satan became prince when bronze serpent raised up on a pole in the desert... is that what you think this was what God talked about? Scripture...

Bingo. I rest my case.

Huh? Where is your Scripture to back up your blabbing statement. You do not make any sense. No wondering the review on one of your books on Amazon wrote, "this book reads like a gibberish rant and nothing ground breaking or new is presented." Go figure.

Son of Mankind?? You do not make any sense but regardless, I can’t help you if you’re not spiritually enlightened by the Holy Spirit on this subject. I listen to God’s Word. Adam was created perfect according to the Scriptures. Of course, you reject that because it contradicts your doctrine...

Meshech, Tubal and all other nations represent professed Christians of the church! Those people of the congregation are the ones who have not yet sealed by God, Revelation 9:4. After God finished secured all His Chosen Elect, He gave professed believers to Satan to be decevied as a judgment...

Let make a quick jump to Ezekiel 38 concerning "countries" with red and blue bold. It is because Scott mentioned the nations in Eze 26 that are also found in Ezekiel 38 for your careful consideration: Eze 38:1-13 (1) And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, (2) Son of man, set thy face...

The Ezekiel passage is clearly speaking about the Prince of Tyrus, who was a historical man, not a spirit and not Satan. God is using Tyrus here as a "representative" of mankind, who, of course, was created perfect (confirmed by Scripture), and yet had rebelled against God in the Garden...

(Continue from previous post) Moreover, if the wedding, the bidding to it, the slain oxen, the farm, the merchandise, the fatlings, and the guests on the highways are not literal things at a very literal wedding, what would make anyone think the armies of the king would magically, and out of...

Ahh.. I think you misunderstood. :-) Let take a look in Matthew 22. Matthew 22:7 (7) But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. While the parable in Matthew 22 talks about armies, it's quite obvious...

Say what?! :Laughingoutloud: One of the most ridiculous carnal interpretations I’ve heard so far. Clearly, you have no understanding of who the woman represents, how the earth “opened its mouth,” or what the “flood” the dragon cast out of his mouth actually signifies. Did you also miss verse...