Search results

I see that you haven't cited Scripture to support your answers which is not surprising. And you’ve also misrepresented (or even know) my view—I’m not teaching about a physical “original Israel,” whether in 70 AD or the modern state of Israel. Both interpretations are incorrect.

What Israel? :bigCeeze

Well... okay. Semi-preterist and partial preterist are basically the same view. Still wrong no matter how hard they try. Not interested in dealing with proven false doctrine.

I can tell that you really do NOT understand what the whole book of Revelation 13 is about, anyway. You just assumed and make speculations here as far as I can see what you wrote lately.

Oh, so Revelation 13:13 is about missiles now? That sounds like pure speculation—especially after admitting you don’t actually know what the Lord meant. Not surprising.

Humm... The lake of fire is a physical magma of the Earth that will last forever?

:watching and waiting:

Indeed. Most modern church pastors have adopted a form of Judaizing—teaching that Christians must align themselves with national Israel as though God’s redemptive plan still centers on a physical nation. In doing so, they echo the same spiritual blindness seen in the Pharisees and scribes of...

You are still confused. I see that you do not make any sense with the word. The Meaning of G4591 in Revelation 1:1: Primary sense: “to make known, indicate, point out, or communicate clearly” An actual revelation or message Usage here: God is revealing or making known to John what is...

LOL… you just built an entire argument around a word I never even used in my previous post that you replied. That’s not clarification—that’s deflection. Instead of dealing with the actual Scriptures I presented, you ran off chasing “signified” and tried to force a definition that doesn’t even...

You still don’t get it—and you keep repeating the same unsupported assumption as if saying it louder makes it true. You claim, “if it doesn’t explicitly tell you otherwise, take it literally.” That is not a biblical rule. You just invented that. Now prove it—from Scripture. You won’t be able...

Your claim is completely weak! And that’s the problem. You boldly say “most times a star is just a literal star,” yet you provide not a single verse to prove it. That is not Bible study—that is opinion dressed up as authority. The book of Revelation does not leave “stars” up for your private...

Volcano... NO. Flaming falling stars...NO Asteroid...NO. God has defined stars in Revelation as Greek, aggelos which actually means messengers. Not literal angels... or anything else. In Old Testament, the Hebrew for messengers is mal'ak. For example: Jamess 2:25 "Likewise also was not...

Your entire explanation is speculative and not clearly supported by Scripture. The Bible teaches that when Christ returns, the saints are gathered to meet Him in the air, not that we continue down to establish a kingdom on this present sin-cursed earth. The gathering is described as believers...

God will not return to dwell permanently on this present sin-cursed earth as it exists today. Scripture teaches that when Christ returns for His people, believers will meet Him in the air. 1 Thessalonians 4:16–17 teaches that the Lord will descend from heaven and the dead in Christ will rise...

Wow! So Douggg—the guy who always insists on a rigid, wooden literal interpretation of everything—is suddenly spiritualizing the Flood now? How convenient. Amazing how “literal” only lasts until it becomes inconvenient. :rolleyes: Now I will explain what Revelation 12:13-17 talks about if...

I really do not care how many others on this forum agree with you. Truth is not determined by popularity. If a group of people all share the same doctrinal error, they will naturally defend each other’s interpretations. That does not make it true — it simply means the same misunderstanding has...

I know for a fact that your so-called “overarching age” interpretation is not from God. It is nothing but speculation of man! And I noticed you weren’t able to provide the Scripture I asked for anyway. So… I think that pretty much settles it. Move on!

Not at all — I’m confident my reasoning is sound. Christ did not talk about Israel in his fig tree parable. :rolleyes: Seventh Age? Overarching age? Chuckle... Like what. Show us the chapters and verses. Yes. More specifically awareness of the Little Season. First, tell me what...

Douggg, Douggg, Douggg.... You and all premillennialists/Dispensationalists seriously need to stop forcing modern political ideas into Scripture. In Gospel of Matthew 24 and Gospel of Luke 21, Christ gave the parable of the fig tree and all the trees. Yet many insist on inventing a theory that...