Search results

So? Neither does 2 Peter. Compare these passages... Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away. 36 “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only. 37 But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming...

This makes no sense to me at all. If I believed that a book contained false teaching, as you believe 2 Peter does (you believe 2 Peter 3:10-12 contradicts other scripture), then I would absolutely not accept it as profitable for teaching. Which verses within 2 Peter do you deem to be profitable...

Are you even trying to see my point? Please read what I say more carefully. My point has nothing to do with the timing of the writing of the book of Hebrews, but rather that you accept it as legitimate scripture that can be used for doctrine despite not knowing for sure who the author is. So...

You are being evasive. I said nothing about the date it was written and nothing about whether or not it was written by Peter. I said that a vast majority of Christians except it as legitimate scripture. And that's regardless of when it was written and whether or not it was written by Peter. So...

Many of those same people do not question its legitimacy as scripture, though. You can't just ignore that. Do you believe there's anything written in 2 Peter that contradicts any other scripture? We don't know for sure who the author of Hebrews is, either, right? But, I would assume that you...

I think dismissing 2 Peter when a vast majority of Christians accept it as legitimate scripture takes that to an extreme. Actually, dismissing the text altogether is quite different than negotiating with the text. Okay. So, do you believe that has happened yet?

You continue to not address my point, but that isn't surprising. Revelation 21:22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. Do you interpret the above verse like this: Revelation 21:22 (Jack Version?): But I saw no temple in it, for the Father, Son...

Are you unable to actually address what others say or do you just not want to do that? Revelation 21:22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. Do you interpret this as saying "for Jesus the Almighty and Jesus the Lamb are its temple" or do you...

I don't wish to continue this particular discussion. I think it's just sad that you have decided to dismiss 2 Peter just because of doctrinal bias (I know you will disagree with that being the reason, but that's how I see it). No, I agree with that premise if you're just saying that Paul wanted...

Do you persist in making false accusations? I don't deny that there are many who haven't heard the gospel yet. Address what I say instead of what your strawman says. I use scripture to back up my view, so address my interpretations of the scriptures rather than falsely claiming that I deny that...

I was talking about the phrase "the Lord God Almighty" in particular. Of course, Jesus is God also, but that particular phrase is used to refer to God the Father. Revelation 21:22 But I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. In this verse the Lord God...

What Paul made clear is that any gospel besides the one he preached was a false gospel. So, he taught the same gospel that the 12 disciples preached. Galatians 1:6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not...

I'm not jealous of Israel and don't hate them at all. Your attempts to slander the character of those who disagree with your end times doctrine is pathetic and shows extreme immaturity on your part. You need to repent of your slander. Do you believe that He wants all of Israel right now to be...

Your understanding of what he said was false. You misread what he said. And beyond what he said there, he also explicitly said in other posts that he does NOT believe that someone can have the mark of the beast and be saved. So, why claim that he does believe that? He does not. This isn't hard.

Yes. Why would I hate them? I want them, and all people, to be saved just as God does (1 Timothy 2:3-6). Is salvation what is important to you or land?

You lied about marty claiming that someone can have the mark of the beast and be saved. He never said that or implied that. Instead, he said that they are unrepentant and not saved.

I don't hate Israel at all. Your childish slander only makes you look like a fool. If that's your goal, then, by all means, continue proving to everyone how foolish you are.

Are you offended by my username, big guy? I'm defending him because you are misrepresenting his beliefs despite being corrected multiple times. You claim that he said someone can have the mark of the beast and be saved and he has explicitly said that he does not believe that. Yet, you still try...