Search results

A differentiation of Persons/Beings (ton theon (Father), and theos [h]en o logos (Son)) is not a difference in nature. This is where you are confused. John 1:6,13 just says "theou". It doesn't even use the definite article and it still refers to the Father. Joh 1:6 εγενετο ανθρωπος...

Yep, there's your problem (Westcott and Hort). Can you show me the marks please from the GNTTR?: Joh 1:1 εν αρχη ην ο λογος και ο λογος ην προς τον θεον και θεος ην ο λογος Can you show me the marks from the early p66...

Jesus is clear keithr: Joh_8:24 I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.

You haven't accepted the word "Lord" as Paul draws from the OT. It's JEHOVAH. Not merely a 'king" ('lord', a ruler). For that you need the Holy Ghost, and you haven't accepted Him either. Therefore, being without the Holy Spirit, and without the Son, you neither have the Father. It's why I...

No, because the carnal heart cannot accept the things of the Holy Spirit. It is also clear you do not understand how the scriptures work. "How [you] read it" is again the carnal heart and rejection of how God already gave it to you for understanding.

Of course the Psalms is addressed to "the King" (Psalms 40:7-8; Hebrews 10:7-9; Luke 24:27, &c). If only you understood who the real King is: Joh_5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. Rev_19:16 And he hath on his...

As stated, "monogenes" has nothing to do with time. It deals explicitly with nature alone. Like the word "angel" has nothing to do with being created, but deals explicitly with being in office/position of messenger.

Let me get this straight from your mouth. You are citing "trinitarian authorties" on a specific part of a single verse, while rejecting their entire theology and position on the whole of scripture? You are agreeing with a "trinitarian" when it suits your purpose for a part of a single verse...

Now that we have looked at Psalms 45:6-7 (7-8 depending), in regards Hebrews 1:8-9, why not pretend to at least address Hebrews 1:10-12, in the same context, of Psalms 102:12,25-27?

Why didn't you cite all of it? "Psalm 45:6-8 Revised Standard Version 6 Your divine throne [a] endures for ever and ever. Your royal scepter is a scepter of equity; 7 you love righteousness and hate wickedness. Therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness...

Why do you allow this butchery of the Hebrew in the first portion of Psalms 45:6 (7 depending), but not in the second portion? Notice, if you want: "God is your throne ...", then why do you not translate it as "Kingdom is your scepter" in the latter part, as it uses the same structure in...

I am apparently dealing with someone unfamiliar with koine Greek translation/transliteration into English letters. It is simple, allow me to show you: ἥν - Wiktionary Ancient Greek Pronunciation IPA(key): /hɛ̌ːn/ → /in/ → /in/ Pronoun ἥν • (hḗn) accusative singular feminine of ὅς (hós)...

Their "admission" is biased to their underlying theology. It has to read that way for them, for "trinitarianism" or "unitarianism", thus arianism, to be true. Yet, the actual translation or original, cannot read that way, for the scripture teaches none of those things, but it does teach the...

Again "trinitarianism" is irrelevant. The text, structure and language and uses comparisons to other texts of scripture is all that matters. Please withdraw the strawman, as I am not "trinitarian", nor advocating "trinitarianism" (I believe this is the 6th or 7th time I have stated this in...

Run away if you want to. Your prerogative.

I already showed, from the texts of scripture what that means. It doesn't mean that the Father is the only JEHOVAH (LORD). It means, in context that the Father is the "monon alethinon theon", and the word "alethinon" means 'true', which in context means "underived in nature" (which links to...

No, it shouldn't because the context of Hebrews 1:8 also includes Hebrews 1:9-12: Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. Heb 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God...

Context: Isa 48:2 For they call themselves of the holy city, and stay themselves upon the God of Israel; The LORD of hosts is his name. Isa 48:11 For mine own sake, even for mine own sake, will I do it: for how should my name be polluted? and I will not give my glory unto another. Isa 48:12...

No. This is the issue at hand, for you are utilizing the phrase "only begotten" incorrectly, and by this I mean using an incorrect definition/understanding. The words "only begotten" translate from the koine Greek monogene (μονογενη; John 3:16), and it means "only one of the same nature...

Let's see if this comparison might help: Mankind example: "Pharaoh" is the highest position in Egypt. Multiple persons/beings are identified as "Pharaoh" in scripture, per example (Genesis 12:15, 41:39; Exodus 2:15, 5:1; Ezekiel 30:24). So when the word "Pharaoh" is used, how do you know which...