Search results

No one has seen God in his true form. The only ones in existence that can claim to have seen him in his true form face to face are the angels in heaven, and Jesus. The only human that actually came close to seeing God the Father in his true form was Moses, and he only saw parts of his true form...

In other words, John describes a Dragon with seven heads and ten horns. Upon those seven heads are seven crowns. The horns are neither translated as "crowns", or "diadems", nor does John describe them as such. He describes the horns as kings, not crowns. :rolleyes:........Get over yourself...

Well, no actually, Rev 12 does in fact speak of the dragon having seven heads and ten horns, so there is no "riddle" to be solved here to begin with. Satan, the dragon gives his power and authority, his dominion over the nations over to the "beast", and it becomes the beast with seven heads and...

Actually, Paul didn't just give a "hint" as to the nature of the resurrected body. He demystifies it by simply comparing it to the body of Jesus. And it was the same body he was buried with, as he proved to his disciples when they touched his hands and feet. The only difference is that his...

I believe you are referring to the 7 heads of the beast that John describes a few verses earlier as seven kings. Its not about the ten horns, different group altogether. At his time, five were already fallen, one already ruled, and the seventh is the "beast", the "little horn" spoken of by...

There are only two things the ten horns could possibly be as I understand it, they are either ten nations or ten unions. Hal Lindsay clearly assumed the ten horns to be nations. This obviously can't be the case because John later states that the water the beast rises out of in his vision is...

After looking at all of them, I can say that there is no "best" or "worst". There is the saying that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. In other words, to consider someone your teacher, is to assume that they are the foremost authority on the subject. They all have something valuable to...

What impasse? All it says is they don't marry because they don't have to by reason of their immortality. Doesn't say they aren't capable of procreating. Its already been settled in his word, you just choose to believe your own personal interpretations of it, reading more into it than is actually...

Well, what does regeneration mean as you understand it

I don't have a reason to believe they are alive, for the simple fact that the angels responsible for those abominations have been locked up in 'outer darkness' for quite some time now. Their skeletal remains may play a role in this deception though. It might be claimed that they were once super...

‍ Repeatedly quoting scriptures out of context is not helping your argument at this point. Here is the bottom line, if angels cannot procreate with humans, then it means they are a different species. I cited the scriptures defining angels on no uncertain terms as a higher form of us, them being...

Yes, it is indeed very possible when looking at the angels guarding Gods throne with their "wheels within wheels" vehicles. Angels are indeed the only other sentient beings in existence that are written about but how are we as Christians going to explain that to the world? You see, this is why...

Jesus never said angels couldn't procreate, the context of the statement was in relation to the promised immortality the saints gain as a reward for believing in him. It was in response to the question of how the tradition of marriage would work in the Resurrection, them not believing in...

Exactly, they go by inductive reasoning. Micro evolution can be tested, therefore it must also occur at a macro level. Therefore as far as they are concerned, anything that doesn't fit into this conclusion, this paradigm, gets rejected outright. They claim their studies are "peer reviewed", yet...

Alien - something that is not earth born. By this basic definition of an alien, or extraterrestrial, that makes angelic beings for instance alien in origin, or celestial to more exact, unless you are claiming angels are terrestrial in origin, which of course has no scriptural support. The...

..........Who in the burning Koala is Emmanuel Macron anyway? To put it simply folks, NO, I do not believe he is the Antichrist. From my understanding, the Bible makes it very clear how we will know who the Antichrist is. The Antichrist will be part of Gods judgement on earth, and the Day of the...

We sure as hell weren't there. Your confusion comes from the assumption that Job is referring to the stars you see at night. For one, the text follows the same format throughout the book of Job, when different terms are used to refer to the same thing, such as the verse below. The...

:) Yeah, I used to listen to Mike all the time. I'll give it a look. Edit: Like how he refers to these heavenly, angelic beings as extraterrestrials. Reason being is because its high time we Christians stop letting the world define to us what an "alien" or "E.T" is supposed to be when the bible...

Well in the book of Job, it is generally agreed that the sons of god being referred to cannot be anything else but angels since they are described as existing some time before the creation of the heavens and the earth, singing in the presence of God himself as they witnessed the creation event...

Exactly, it wasn't the lack of belief in the miracles themselves that was the problem, it was who they gave credit to for his miracles that makes it unpardonable.