Search results

We must remember that when Jesus walks out of the Heavenly Sanctuary, prophetic time is no more which means the symbolism is no more. He walks out, takes off His priestly robes, puts on His royal robes, and comes back to get us. The 7 Last Plagues are literal plagues which fall after Jesus...

Jesuit Luiz Alcazar is credited with formulating "Jesuit Preterism". Jesuit Francisco Ribera is credited with formulation "Jesuit Futurism" Rome is happy for you to believe the one or the other, so long as you don't believe Protestant Historicism which says the papal antichrist arose in Rome...

What's astonishing is that you can show Christians what happened in church history - how the papacy invented Jesuit Preterism and Jesuit Futurism to get people looking for antichrist anywhere but in Rome - and they STILL insist on denying the truth of Protestant Historicism! It seems Luther had...

Interesting point...although I still say God never forces anyone to do or be anything. How can we be so sure? Jesus. "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father. How sayest thou then, Show us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in Me?" Jesus never compelled...

What's the significance of that date to them? Something to do with Abraham?

The Jesuits invented "Jesuit Preterism" and "Jesuit Futurism" to get the Reformers who were looking at Rome as the antichrist of Bible prophecy to look elsewhere: Jesuit Preterism said antichrist arose in the 1st century and was probably Nero or some other tyrant, while Jesuit Futurism says...

The 7 last plagues - which is still future. I'm not aware of any inconsistencies with Historicism. Can you point some out for me? OK, so since Isaiah said what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah was going to happen to Babylon, and since there's no "2 ages" prophecy for Sodom and Gomorrah, we...

Friend, Protestant Historicism and Jesuit Preterism are nothing alike. Jesuit Preterism, as in the case of the Jesuit Futurism you subscribe to, were introduced to the world during the Protestant Reformation when the Reformers were preaching the "twin pillars of the Reformation - "faith alone"...

"False"? Protestant Historicism is the only one that makes sense. Isaiah says what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah was to happen to Babylon...so, when you find the verse that says Sodom and Gomorrah was "rebuilt" and "re-inhabited" after "two generations" - I'll be ready to consider your idea...

Interesting point...although I still say God never forces anyone to do or be anything. How can we be so sure? Jesus. "He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father. How sayest thou then, Show us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in Me?" Jesus never compelled...

Hi, JR - know this: Everything I write is in the spirit of loving kindness. My style of writing which includes direct challenge and direct condemnation of ideas which should in no way should be intrepreted as rude or unkind. I speak the truth in love, friend. So, please, don't assume I'm...

Blame God for what? Extending salvation to EVERYONE and not just you and your "specially chosen" ilk? Many Luciferians/secret society folks think they're "specially chosen" because Satan appeared to them as an "angel of light" bearing "the truth" that the Bible is wrong, the Serpent was the...

Well said...Protestant Historicism is the truth. Jesuit Preterism and Jesuit Futurism is are papal lies.

Shame on YOU for allowing yourself to be seduced by a satanic "religion of exclusivity" - the same kind practiced by Luciferians, catholics, occults, etc., and the rest of the "specially chosen".

Yes, I read it. Please allow me to address two of your points: 1. Jesus told us to be "perfect" - are not all His biddings enablings? Can we not do "all things" through His power? One inspired writer said the command that we be "perfect" means "perfect in our sphere just as God is "perfect in...

Yes, but since that statement doesn't specify whether it was done by His word or by His nature - the Calvinist's claim that it was by His word is purely subjective opinion - not objective Biblical reasoning.

To those who appeal to Bible verses to insist the weekly Sabbath is no more, your willful refusal to recognize the Biblical distinction between the Law of God and the Law of Moses will not hold up in Heavenly Court: It is not reasonable to read "the law is holy, just, and good" but also read...

The Two don't replace the Ten - they summarize the Ten. Also, if "fulfill" means "do away with", then you must agree that "all righteousness" was fulfilled and "done away with" when Jesus was baptized, right? Of course not. "Fulfill" refers to "fulfill an obligation". We must compare Mark...

"Think not I have come to destroy the law and the prophets. I have not come to destroy, but to fulfill". The Sabbath is as relevant today as it was all the way back in the garden of Eden.

Some have the misapprehension that God "caused" Pharaoh's heart to harden, especially our Calvinist friends who insist that all are predestined for heaven or hell - a "Christian" variation of the same satanic "exclusivity religion" practiced by catholics, Luciferians, Freemasons, secret...