Search results

Religious leaders of Jesus day said he wasn't a faithful witness to the true God, that doesn't mean those religious leaders or people of Jesus day were correct in what they said about him. Everyone certainly is entitled to their opinion of what makes Biblical doctrine, but I understand that we...

If the papacy is the first beast, why don't we consider the spanish inquisition to be the second?[/Quote\] Part four The Image of the Wild Beast Is this two-horned wild beast as innocent as its lamb like horns would indicate? John goes on to say: “And it...

If the papacy is the first beast, why don't we consider the spanish inquisition to be the second?[/Quote\] Part three The wily Satan had plans for manipulating the wild beast to his own ends. John explains this: “And a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies was...

If the papacy is the first beast, why don't we consider the spanish inquisition to be the second?[/Quote\] Part two Early in the Lord’s day, calamity strikes the wild beast. John reports: “And I saw one of its heads as though slaughtered to death, but its...

If the papacy is the first beast, why don't we consider the spanish inquisition to be the second?[/Quote\] PART ONE I don't think the Papacy was or is the first Beast. At Revelation 12:17 it tells us that the dragon became enraged at the woman and went to rage war...

Jesus said he hadn't gone to his Father in heaven when he was talking to Mary Magdalene. When Jesus told Mary to tell his Apostles and disciples that he was going to his Father and their Father and his God and their God there's nothing in that scripture that means that Jesus was going right...

when will the two witnesses appear and WHO ARE THEY Who are these two witnesses? I think the details of the account help us to identify them. We are told that they “are symbolized by the two olive trees and the two lampstands.” (Rev. 11:4) Doesn't this reminds us of the lampstand and two olive...

The extent that John 20:17 creates a problem in correct understanding depends largely on the Bible translation one uses. Both the Catholic Douay and the King James Version represent Jesus as telling Mary not to “touch” him. The Douay reads: “Jesus saith to her: Do not touch me, for I am not yet...

If you honestly believe Genesis 2:17 is a prophecy of God saying Adam would be disobedient regarding the forbidden tree, I don't really concern myself with what you're saying concerning the scriptures. There's nothing in Genesis 2:17 that shows it's a prophecy that Adam would be disobedient...

You don't have a clue what the scriptures say if you truly believe that Genesis 2:17 is a prophecy of God saying Adam would disobey The command to not eat of the forbidden tree. Basically you're saying that God gave Adam an impossible command to obey. God doesn't give any person angel or human...

No I'm actually not going against God word. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil has always represented God rulership. At Genesis 3:22 when God said Adam and Eve had become like one of us, God was saying that Adam and Eve(mankind) had decided to choose a self determining course of what...

As usual you never considered the context of philippians 2:5-8. This scripture is telling us to have the same mental attitude of humbleness as Jesus had. So according to those Like you who take this scripture out of context we all suppose to think ourselves equal with God. Yeah right...

Actually the only Begotten Son of God is a created being, the scriptures show us that. Revelation 3:14; Colossians 1:15

WHO IS JESUS CHRIST It seems to me that everyone seems to believe that people should deny that it was the Only Begotten Son of God that God sent to the world of mankind. People instead say people must believe it was God who came to the world of mankind and became human like the first man Adam...

It seems reasonable to me that at Revelation 13:1 that the seven headed wild beast represents the worldwide political system. I mean it has authority, power, and a throne, which seems to point to it's being a political entity.(Revelation 13:2) It also rules over "every tribe and people and...

I could care less what you or anyone else thinks about the watchtower and the NWT or the JW, and you right goodbye

Then you're not listening to what I texted. I didn't say and I'm not saying the Word is with Jesus. I'm saying that what John 1:1 is saying, that in the beginning was the Word, and the Word is the Only Begotten Son of God and the Word who is the Only Begotten Son of God was with The God, and the...

What you said about Harry and Cliff doesn't prove that Harry and Cliff are the same person so Cliff and Harry both are not the Word. What it's saying is Harry is the Word and the Word who is Harry is with Cliff.

At John 1:1 it tells us in part that in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with the God. So since at John 1:14 it says the Word was made flesh it can't be God who was made flesh since the 1st part of John 1:1 says not that the Word is God but that the Word was with God. The last part of...

You did say both God and the Only Begotten Son of God is the Word which shows how twisted you are and how unreasonable you are I will not be answering any more of your posts Tong