Search results

Does not 1 John 5:3 KJV plainly tell us "agape" is demonstrated by happily keeping God's commandments"? Yes, it does. The wicked can't keep God's commandments even if they wanted to (Romans 8:7 KJV) so give it up, son. THE WICKED CANNOT PARTAKE OF AGAPE, NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU WANT "AGAPEO"...

Verse 2 and verse 3 are two different verses, so just stop with the straw man, OK? Post, how can the wicked demonstrate "agape" when 1 John 5:3 KJV plainly says "agape" is demonstrated by happily keeping the commandments of God, while the wicked can't keep them even if they wanted to...

Barnes and Noble hadn't been invented yet, so disdaining the inconvenience, He just spoke directly from atop a mountain -- and used the Definite Article "the" when telling us which day of the week is the Sabbath, and not the Indefinite Article "a" upon which your disproven argument rests. He...

It ain't slander if it's the truth. Post, are you so disturbed emotionally as to not see that your own words prove my point? You just said yourself that CC is decidedly anti-catholic which proves they are no less intolerant of dissention than the papal system whose views they censor. So, not...

So what? Did I reference verse 18? And how does that undo the truth that "agape" is demonstrated by happily keeping the commandments of God (1 John 5:3 KJV) which the wicked can't keep even if they wanted to (Romans 8:7 KJV) which disproves your blasphemous, asinine claim that the wicked can...

Blurring the lines between the Greek words for "love", are we? Y'all just keep making it up as you go, it seems. 1 John 5:3 KJV is plain that Christian "agape" is demonstrated when we "keep the commandments of God" and Romans 8:7 KJV is plain the wicked can't keep them even if they wanted to...

What accusation? There isn't any accusation in that post, only a recap of the facts and an appeal for retraction of another's heretical claim that the wicked can partake of agape. Because that's how we show agape to one another, according to Leviticus 19:17 KJV: we rebuke others when they get...

God said "the" seventh day, "the" being a definite article referring to the one specific seventh day. If it said "a" seventh day you'd have a point. If someone said, "I've got $1,000 for you on the seventh day", you'd be there, right? All your uncertainty about which day that was would...

Please don't deflect - the issue to which I refer is your claim the wicked can partake of God's agape. After being shown the Biblical evidence for why your claim isn't possible: 1 John 5:3 KJV says the "agape" of God is demonstrated by happily keeping His commandments, which the wicked can't...

Yep, that's what I meant by the "skulduggery" of modern Big Pharma "experts".

How about you just refer to me as "phoneman777" instead of "teledude" or "cellphone" or whatever else?

In keeping with the true satanic spirit of Papal authority and their intolerance of the truth.

So, you DO agree with me the Ten Commandments remain for us to obey for all eternity? If so, my apologies, because you've been denying this all along.

How the flippity flop could Eve have been created AFTER the Sabbath? Please please please, don't tell me you're unfamiliar with Hebrew Chiastic Structure, right? A kind of poetry formed out of a mindset where not words, but ideas are rhymed? Where the "story arc" resembles a "Bell Curve" in...

Thanks. It's sad the "evidence" used to establish Jesuit Futurism has to do with such thinly framed arguments as "generation" pertaining to a future race instead of Jesus' present audience, or disqualified stones which we're violently thrown down but happened to come to rest upon another here or...

So, what other "precepts" did God carve out of solid rock and write with His own hands that "stand forever and ever"? When we abandon context, we're left only with pretext which is the foundation of all your false doctrines. Whether "precept" or "commandments", it's referring to that which God...

Jesus accused hypocrites of "teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" and quoted Isaiah 29, where the prophet said and the fear of the Lord "is taught by the precepts of men". I'm amazed you so laser focus on what amounts to nothing, but refuse to acknowledge "SABBATIMOS" in Hebrews 4:9...

Yes, at this point, I can see where it's possible to interpret it that way. However, it can also be interpreted another way because it was indeed one generation from the destruction.

The Israelites had to wander 40 years, each day for a year - which begs the question: why such a harsh punishment? The answer is obvious: it would take that long for the bones of every unbelieving Israelite of that generation to be buried.

Revelation 22:14 KJV is there for nothin? What you're saying is that a Christian who decides to sell his soul to Satan may still gain entrance to heaven - which means you have a warped, immature understanding of what it means to be "dead to the law" and "not under the law" and "under grace"...