Search results

Oh, so I take it you are implying that Jesus Christ didn't bodily rise from the tomb?

Ha!!! Apparently not

:rolleyes: You already got your answer from the Lords own words, presented in full, and not simple one liner's. You "Jesus is in us and with us" creatures can't reconcile this belief with his actual presence. I'll ask this simple question, if you cannot answer truthfully, you're going on ignore...

And that's why I'm a hairs breath away from putting him on ignore. If he wants to pretend like he doesn't know what I'm referring to, then he can play that game with someone else. No, he is not among us, his physical presence is with the Father in heaven. The "Jesus is with us" clowns can't have...

:rolleyes: You should really stop inferring what you claim I don't know, apparently you haven't learned your lesson from before in claiming I have an "elementary" understanding of scripture. Jesus Christ ain't here. If he was, then the Holy Spirit cannot be here. How about you stop taking...

The holy spirit, the comforter is in our midst, but Jesus Christ is not. If we were in his presence, the world would be on its knee's begging for mercy, because when he returns, he isn't going be the nice guy we knew him to be the first go around....thankfully.

For a ton of reasons, almost none of the major events have occurred in Revelation for one, and before Jesus comes, the anti-Christ must have his way, so people might as well get this "Jesus is coming soon" crap out of their minds right now. It is no secret within the "truther" community of the...

As long as that "Unitarian" understands that it was the messiah that saved them, then no, they won't be in hell. I know of no scripture stating the contrary.

No

:rolleyes: The "LORD" who is the "Lord" in the flesh.....yet clearly SEPARATE. The throne of God AND of the Lamb: Its very explicit in its meaning, that there are two different thrones for two different people. It is the prophecy of the Lamb who will sit on the right hand of God the Father...

I am in essence referring to two different people. Its saying that God the Father spoke fire and brimstone upon Sodom through his son in heaven, being "the word". I'm sure we all know there is only one God, its basic doctrine, no need to repeat yourself on the matter. Your "Lord" versus "LORD"...

Explain the following scripture if "after our likeness" isn't referring to more than one person of the God head. How does your rant about "diversity" match the two "LORDs" (upper case) below? So we have two upper case "LORDS". One of many reasons why I don't base my theological viewpoint on...

:rolleyes: Your question has been answered below.....And I'm still waiting on your response to my question. Who sits on the throne? I don't if you don't. According to the totality of scripture, you have three, not one or two, separate yet acting as one, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit...

:rolleyes: M'kay, we all know Jesus Christ is the word made flesh.......your point?

Whenever the Father speaks, it is the Father speaking through Jesus as "the word". This is why Jesus referred to himself as the one who spoke to Moses in the from of a burning bush. Again, I don't get too hung up on capitalized letters. That in of itself will not give you a full understanding...

You forget the verses before stating on no uncertain terms that the one sitting on the throne is clearly NOT Jesus. Again, if you base your entire theological viewpoint based on only a few verses, and capitalized letters, you are bound to be in error.

If you are going to base your entire theological viewpoint on the flesh based on one or two verses in this way, then it has to be consistent, both from old to new testament. There was no Jesus in the old testament and you can't have one without the other. This isn't just about Jesus, this is...

This is hardly an answer at all. When I say 'God', I'm referring to God the Father, not the son. If God can't dwell among the flesh, then that doesn't explain the events that occurred before the fall. Forget about Noah and Enoch who scripture states "walked with God", scripture wasn't...

Ezekiel gave a similar description of the one who sat on the throne as if he had a body. He had the appearance of a man, so when scripture states multiple times that we were made in God's image, it meant that literally. My faith isn't built on stupid metaphor's.

This discussion brings forth another question. Scripture states that we cannot see God because if we did we'd be deader than a door nail. So can God dwell among flesh at all? The way you use certain scriptures suggests that you believe this, with your constant referral to God being pure spirit...